House roll call vote
house-vote:119-1:87House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution
LawLinter roll call 119-1/87
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Apr 1, 2025 Failed 431 positions
Yea
206
47.8%
Nay
222
51.5%
Present: 0 (0.0%)
Not voting: 3 (0.7%)
Party snapshot
Republican
218
Yea
206
94.5%
Nay
9
4.1%
Not voting 3
Democratic
213
Yea
0
0.0%
Nay
213
100.0%
Legislation voted on
HRES 282 - 119Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
Status In session
Policy area Congress
Introduced Apr 1, 2025
Latest bill action
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Shareable source
Vote social kit
Roll-call content drafts
Native-copy drafts and image prompts built from the vote date, result, totals, percentages, related bill, and party-wise rollup data on this page.
X / Threads / Bluesky
Native, no-link version for short-form posts.
House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution Result: Failed on Apr 1, 2025; Total recorded positions: 431; Yea: 206 (47.8%); Nay: 222 (51.5%); Not voting: 3 (0.7%) Related bill: HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Insti...
Vote data snapshot
Deterministic source-backed roll-call facts from this vote page. No AI.
House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution source snapshot Vote basics: - Date: Apr 1, 2025 - Result: Failed - Total positions: 431 - Yea: 206 (47.8%) - Nay: 222 (51.5%) - Present: 0 (0.0%) - Not voting: 3 (0.7%) Roll-call context: Question: On Agreeing to the Resolution Vote type: Recorded Vote Related bill: - HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. Party-wise breakdown: - Republican: 218 total - Yea 206 (94.5%) - Nay 9 (4.1%) - Not voting 3 (1.4%) - Democratic: 213 total - Yea 0 (0.0%) - Nay 213 (100.0%) Official source links: - Congress.gov: https://www.congress.gov/votes/house/119-1/87 - Official roll call XML: https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll087.xml
LinkedIn / Facebook
Longer native post with source-review framing.
House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution Result: Failed on Apr 1, 2025; Total recorded positions: 431; Yea: 206 (47.8%); Nay: 222 (51.5%); Not voting: 3 (0.7%) Question: On Agreeing to the Resolution Vote type: Recorded Vote Related bill: HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. Party breakdown: Republican: 218 total - Yea 206 (94.5%) - Nay 9 (4.1%) - Not voting 3 (1.4%) Democratic: 213 total - Yea 0 (0.0%) - Nay 213 (100.0%) Use this as a source-review starting point: check the roll-call page for member-by-member positions and official links.
Reddit draft
Title and body format for manual subreddit review. Add the link only where community rules allow it.
Title: House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution Body: Result: Failed on Apr 1, 2025; Total recorded positions: 431; Yea: 206 (47.8%); Nay: 222 (51.5%); Not voting: 3 (0.7%) Related bill: HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. Party-wise vote split: Republican: 218 total - Yea 206 (94.5%) - Nay 9 (4.1%) - Not voting 3 (1.4%) Democratic: 213 total - Yea 0 (0.0%) - Nay 213 (100.0%) The LawLinter vote page has the member-by-member roll call and official source links.
Thread
Copy the whole thread, then split at the separators when posting manually.
House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution Result: Failed on Apr 1, 2025; Total recorded positions: 431; Yea: 206 (47.8%); Nay: 222 (51.5%); Not voting: 3 (0.7%) --- Vote totals Yea: 206 (47.8%) Nay: 222 (51.5%) Present: 0 (0.0%) Not voting: 3 (0.7%) --- Party context Republican: 218 total - Yea 206 (94.5%) - Nay 9 (4.1%) - Not voting 3 (1.4%) Democratic: 213 total - Yea 0 (0.0%) - Nay 213 (100.0%) --- Related bill HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration... --- The useful part is the member-by-member roll call: who voted yea, who voted nay, and who did not vote.
Link later
Use this in a follow-up only after link-heavy posting has cooled down.
https://lawlinter.com/votes/house/119-1/87?utm_campaign=house_vote_social_kit&utm_medium=social&utm_source=manual
Screenshot card
Use this as a native visual by taking a screenshot. The outcome is prominent; party context is secondary.
LawLinter roll call 119-1/87
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Apr 1, 2025 Failed 431 positions
Yea
206
47.8%
Nay
222
51.5%
Present: 0 (0.0%)
Not voting: 3 (0.7%)
Party snapshot
Republican
218
Yea
206
94.5%
Nay
9
4.1%
Not voting 3
Democratic
213
Yea
0
0.0%
Nay
213
100.0%
Visual caption
Caption for Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, or a screenshot post.
House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution Result: Failed on Apr 1, 2025; Total recorded positions: 431; Yea: 206 (47.8%); Nay: 222 (51.5%); Not voting: 3 (0.7%) Related bill: HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. Full member roll call and official source links are on LawLinter.
Hook + search phrases
Plain text to post with an infographic. Use one hook, then work the search phrases naturally into the caption.
Use one hook as the first line of the post, then work 2-4 search phrases naturally into the caption. Do not paste the whole keyword list as a block. Hook options: - How the House voted on roll call 87 - Inside House Vote 119-1/87: Failed - Who voted yea and nay on this House roll call - The vote record behind HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. Search phrases to include naturally: - House roll call 87 - House vote 119-1 87 - House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution - House vote yea nay breakdown - member by member House vote - HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. Simple caption pattern: House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution Result: Failed on Apr 1, 2025; Total recorded positions: 431; Yea: 206 (47.8%); Nay: 222 (51.5%); Not voting: 3 (0.7%) Related bill: HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. Full member roll call and official source links are on LawLinter.
Image prompt
Optional prompt if you later generate a custom image manually.
Create a clean LawLinter social graphic about a House roll-call vote. Make the actual vote outcome the dominant visual: result, date, yea count, nay count, and total positions. Make the voted-on legislation obvious near the top: use a dedicated 'Legislation voted on' band with the bill number and short title, not a tiny corner label. Use party breakdown only as smaller supporting context. Subject: House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Vote facts: Result: Failed on Apr 1, 2025; Total recorded positions: 431; Yea: 206 (47.8%); Nay: 222 (51.5%); Not voting: 3 (0.7%). Legislation voted on: HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.. Tone: neutral legislative research, not partisan, not promotional.
Graphic packet prompts
Vote breakdown infographic prompts
Copy focused prompts for roll-call graphics. The lead prompt makes the actual vote result dominant; the party prompt keeps within-party percentages as supporting context.
Graphic prompt - vote result
Lead graphic with the date, result, yea/nay totals, percentages, and related bill context.
Create a LawLinter social-media infographic. Graphic packet: House vote result card Vote: House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution Facts to show: - Legislation voted on: HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. - Vote: House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution - Date: Apr 1, 2025 - Result: Failed - Total positions: 431 - Yea: 206 (47.8%) - Nay: 222 (51.5%) - Present: 0 (0.0%) - Not voting: 3 (0.7%) - Question: On Agreeing to the Resolution - Vote type: Recorded Vote - Secondary party context: Republican: 218 total - Yea 206 (94.5%) - Nay 9 (4.1%) - Not voting 3 (1.4%) | Democratic: 213 total - Yea 0 (0.0%) - Nay 213 (100.0%) Visual direction: Make the actual vote result the main event: large result badge, date, roll-call identifier, and oversized Yea/Nay counters with percentages. Directly beneath the title/result area, include a high-visibility 'Legislation voted on' band with the bill number and short title; it must be readable at mobile size and must not be buried in a footer, corner, or tiny source strip. Place party breakdown in a smaller lower panel so it supports the outcome without competing with it. Hierarchy requirements: - The viewer must understand both what happened in the vote and what legislation was voted on without reading small text. - If legislation is supplied, reserve a clear, readable band or panel for the bill number and short title near the top third of the graphic. - Do not reduce the bill number/title to a footer, source strip, corner badge, or tiny footnote. Style requirements: Use the LawLinter visual identity: dark civic data dashboard, near-black background #0B0F16, elevated panel #111827, secondary panel #162032, border blue #1F6FEB, accent cyan #19C3FF, white text #F8FAFC, muted text #CBD5E1, success teal #14B8A6, warning amber #F59E0B. Make it social-media friendly: use a vertical 2:3 portrait aspect ratio, ideally 1024x1536 or 1080x1620. Keep all important text inside generous safe margins and do not create a horizontal image unless explicitly requested. Prioritize mobile readability: large headline, 3-6 facts maximum, high contrast, no tiny legal text, no overloaded tables. Tone must be neutral legislative research. No partisan framing, no campaign symbols, no unsupported causal claims. Include a small LawLinter wordmark text and source-analysis framing. Use 'source context' wording when data is contextual rather than bill-caused. Vote-color rule: use success teal or emerald for Yea, rose #FB7185 for Nay, amber #F59E0B for Present, and muted slate for Not voting. Do not use colors to imply party preference.
Graphic prompt - party breakdown
Secondary carousel graphic showing within-party yea/nay/not-voting percentages.
Create a LawLinter social-media infographic. Graphic packet: House vote party breakdown card Vote: House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution Facts to show: - Legislation voted on: HRES 282 - 119 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. - Vote: House Vote 119-1 Roll Call 87: On Agreeing to the Resolution - Date: Apr 1, 2025 - Overall result: Result: Failed on Apr 1, 2025; Total recorded positions: 431; Yea: 206 (47.8%); Nay: 222 (51.5%); Not voting: 3 (0.7%) - Republican: 218 total - Yea 206 (94.5%) - Nay 9 (4.1%) - Not voting 3 (1.4%) - Democratic: 213 total - Yea 0 (0.0%) - Nay 213 (100.0%) Visual direction: Create a secondary breakdown graphic. Keep the overall vote result and the legislation voted on visible in the header area, then show compact party rows with within-party percentages for Yea, Nay, Present, and Not voting. Do not color parties as red/blue teams; use vote-position colors only. Hierarchy requirements: - The viewer must understand both what happened in the vote and what legislation was voted on without reading small text. - If legislation is supplied, reserve a clear, readable band or panel for the bill number and short title near the top third of the graphic. - Do not reduce the bill number/title to a footer, source strip, corner badge, or tiny footnote. Style requirements: Use the LawLinter visual identity: dark civic data dashboard, near-black background #0B0F16, elevated panel #111827, secondary panel #162032, border blue #1F6FEB, accent cyan #19C3FF, white text #F8FAFC, muted text #CBD5E1, success teal #14B8A6, warning amber #F59E0B. Make it social-media friendly: use a vertical 2:3 portrait aspect ratio, ideally 1024x1536 or 1080x1620. Keep all important text inside generous safe margins and do not create a horizontal image unless explicitly requested. Prioritize mobile readability: large headline, 3-6 facts maximum, high contrast, no tiny legal text, no overloaded tables. Tone must be neutral legislative research. No partisan framing, no campaign symbols, no unsupported causal claims. Include a small LawLinter wordmark text and source-analysis framing. Use 'source context' wording when data is contextual rather than bill-caused. Vote-color rule: use success teal or emerald for Yea, rose #FB7185 for Nay, amber #F59E0B for Present, and muted slate for Not voting. Do not use colors to imply party preference.
All Votes
431 votes
Representative Party State Vote
Compiled vote record. Vote pages normalize official roll call data into filterable member positions and rollups. Party, state, and member slices are for research context and can depend on the latest ingested source data; verify close or consequential votes with the official source.