Back to law search
PUB 107-67

Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2002

Became Public Law No: 107-67.

Originating Bill

Sponsors

Timeline

Nov 12, 2001

Signed by President.

Nov 12, 2001

Signed by President.

Nov 12, 2001

Became Public Law No: 107-67.

Nov 12, 2001

Became Public Law No: 107-67.

Nov 2, 2001

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Nov 2, 2001

Presented to President.

Nov 2, 2001

Presented to President.

Nov 1, 2001

Conference papers: Senate report and manager's statement held at the desk in Senate.

Nov 1, 2001

Conference report considered in Senate. (consideration: CR S11329-11333, S11344-11345)

Nov 1, 2001

Conference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 83 - 15. Record Vote Number: 321.

Nov 1, 2001

Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 83 - 15. Record Vote Number: 321.

Oct 31, 2001

Mr. Istook brought up conference report H. Rept. 107-253 by previously agreed to special order.

Oct 31, 2001

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.

Oct 31, 2001

The previous question was ordered without objection.

Oct 31, 2001

VOTE POSTPONED - Pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed the requirement for the Yeas and Nays on the question of adoption of the conference report until later in the legislative day.

Oct 31, 2001

The House proceeded to consider the conference report H.Rept. 107-253 as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H7536-7545, H7557-7558)

Oct 31, 2001

Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 339 - 85 (Roll no. 413).

Oct 31, 2001

Motions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Oct 31, 2001

On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 339 - 85 (Roll no. 413).

Oct 31, 2001

Conference papers: message on House action held at the desk in Senate.

Oct 26, 2001

Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 107-253 filed.(text of conference report: CR 10/29/2001 H7337-7356)

Oct 26, 2001

Conference report H. Rept. 107-253 filed. (text of conference report: CR 10/29/2001 H7337-7356)

Oct 25, 2001

Mr. Wolf asked unanimous consent that managers on the part of the House have until midnight on Oct. 26 to file a conference report on H.R. 2590. Agreed to without objection.

Oct 25, 2001

Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.

Oct 25, 2001

Conferees agreed to file conference report.

Oct 5, 2001

Mr. Istook asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.

Oct 5, 2001

On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H6383)

Oct 5, 2001

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Oct 5, 2001

The Speaker appointed conferees: Istook, Wolf, Northup, Sununu, Peterson (PA), Tiahrt, Sweeney, Sherwood, Young (FL), Hoyer, Meek (FL), Price (NC), Rothman, Visclosky, and Obey.

Sep 20, 2001

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Sep 19, 2001

Senate Committee on Appropriations discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9470-9477, S9485-9486, S9489-9490, S9491-9497)

Sep 19, 2001

Senate Committee on Appropriations discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9470-9477, S9485-9486, S9489-9490, S9491-9497)

Sep 19, 2001

Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.

Sep 19, 2001

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.(text as passed Senate: CR 9/21/2001 S9661-9673)

Sep 19, 2001

Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote. (text as passed Senate: CR 9/21/2001 S9661-9673)

Sep 19, 2001

Senate insists on its amendment, asks for a conference, appoints conferees Dorgan, Mikulski, Landrieu, Reed, Byrd, Campbell, Shelby, DeWine and Stevens.

Jul 26, 2001

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Jul 25, 2001

Rule H. Res. 206 passed House.

Jul 25, 2001

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 206. (consideration: CR H4553-4594; text of Title I as reported in House: CR H4563-4566; text of Title II as reported in House: CR H4568; text of Title III as reported in House: CR H4568-4570; text of Title IV as reported in House: CR H4571-4573; text of Title V as reported in House: CR H4573-4574; text of Title VI as reported in House: CR H4574-4577)

Jul 25, 2001

Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2590 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments.

Jul 25, 2001

House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 206 and Rule XXIII.

Jul 25, 2001

The Speaker designated the Honorable David Dreier to act as Chairman of the Committee.

Jul 25, 2001

GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 2590.

Jul 25, 2001

DEBATE - UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE WILL PROCEED WITH DEBATE ON AMENDMENTS UNDER THE FIVE-MINUTE RULE.

Jul 25, 2001

Mr. Obey moved to strike the enacting clause.

Jul 25, 2001

Floor summary: DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Obey preferential motion to strike the enacting clause.

Jul 25, 2001

On motion to strike the enacting clause Failed by voice vote.

Jul 25, 2001

DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole continued with debate on the Inslee amendment under the five-minute rule.

Jul 25, 2001

VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Inslee amendment, the Chair put the question on the adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Istook demanded a recorded vote pending the absence of a quorum and under the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day. The point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.

Jul 25, 2001

VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Hinchey amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hinchey demanded a recorded vote and pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Jul 25, 2001

ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Istook asked unanimous consent that, during further consideration of the amendments numbered 5, 7, and 8 in the Committee of the Whole pursuant to H. Res. 206: (1) amendment No.7 shall immediately follow amendment No. 5; (2) amendment No. 5 shall be subject only to the amendment offered by Mr. Flake; (3) amendment No. 7 shall be subject only to one substantive amendment; (4) amendments Nos. 5 and 7 shall each be debatable for 20 minutes; and (5) debate on amendment No. 8 shall be for one hour. Agreed to without objection.

Jul 25, 2001

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4594-4610)

Jul 25, 2001

DEBATE - Pursuant to a unanimous consent agreement, debate on the Wynn amendment was limited to 10 minutes, equally divided and controlled.

Jul 25, 2001

Pursuant to the previous order of the House, the Committee proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the amendment offered by Mr. Smith (NJ).

Jul 25, 2001

Pursuant to the previous order of the House, the Committee proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the substitute amendment offered by Mr. Flake.

Jul 25, 2001

VOTES POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Flake amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Flake demanded a recorded vote and pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment and the underlying Smith of New Jersey amendment until later in the legislative day.

Jul 25, 2001

Pursuant to the previous order of the House, the Committee proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the amendment offered by Mr. Rangel.

Jul 25, 2001

VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Rangel amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Rangel demanded a recorded vote and pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Jul 25, 2001

DEBATE - The Committee is debating the amendment offered by Mr. Traficant.

Jul 25, 2001

VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Traficant amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Traficant demanded a recorded vote and pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Jul 25, 2001

Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2590 as unfinished business.

Jul 25, 2001

ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Istook asked unanimous consent that, during consideration of H.R. 2590 in the Committee of the Whole pursuant to H. Res. 206, no further amendment to the bill may be offered except: (1) pro forma amendments offered by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; (2) the amendment numbered 8, debatable for 30 minutes; (3) the amendment offered by Mr. Filner, debatable for 30 minutes. Agreed to without objection.

Jul 25, 2001

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4610-4622)

Jul 25, 2001

The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.

Jul 25, 2001

DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Hastings (FL) amendment, pending reservation of a point of order.

Jul 25, 2001

DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 40 minutes of debate on the Filner amendment.

Jul 25, 2001

VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the Filner amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Filner demanded a recorded vote and pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Jul 25, 2001

UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.

Jul 25, 2001

The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2590.

Jul 25, 2001

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Jul 25, 2001

The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

Jul 25, 2001

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 334 - 94 (Roll no. 274).

Jul 25, 2001

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 334 - 94 (Roll no. 274).

Jul 25, 2001

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Jul 24, 2001

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 206 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2590 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments.

Jul 23, 2001

Introduced in House

Jul 23, 2001

The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-152, by Mr. Istook.

Jul 23, 2001

The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-152, by Mr. Istook.

Jul 23, 2001

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 88.

Compiled law record. Law pages connect public-law records back to originating bills, sponsors, actions, subjects, and committees where the source data supports those relationships. Official government sources remain authoritative for legal status, enacted text, and effective dates.