Back to law search
PUB 107-248

Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2003

Became Public Law No: 107-248.

Originating Bill

Sponsors

Timeline

Oct 23, 2002

Signed by President.

Oct 23, 2002

Signed by President.

Oct 23, 2002

Became Public Law No: 107-248.

Oct 23, 2002

Became Public Law No: 107-248.

Oct 18, 2002

Presented to President.

Oct 18, 2002

Presented to President.

Oct 16, 2002

Conference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 93 - 1. Record Vote Number: 239.(consideration: CR S10516-10524)

Oct 16, 2002

Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 93 - 1. Record Vote Number: 239. (consideration: CR S10516-10524)

Oct 16, 2002

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Oct 10, 2002

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 579 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 5010 with 1 hour of general debate.

Oct 10, 2002

Conference papers: Senate report and manager's statement and message on House action held at the desk in Senate.

Oct 10, 2002

Rule H. Res. 579 passed House.

Oct 10, 2002

Mr. Lewis (CA) brought up conference report H. Rept. 107-732 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 579. (consideration: CR H7802-7812)

Oct 10, 2002

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report to accompany H.R. 5010.

Oct 10, 2002

The previous question was ordered without objection.

Oct 10, 2002

Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 409 - 14 (Roll no. 457).

Oct 10, 2002

Motions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Oct 10, 2002

On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 409 - 14 (Roll no. 457).

Oct 10, 2002

Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.

Oct 10, 2002

Conferees agreed to file conference report.

Oct 9, 2002

Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 107-732 filed.(text of conference report: (CR H7442-7706)

Oct 9, 2002

Conference report H. Rept. 107-732 filed. (text of conference report: (CR H7442-7706)

Sep 10, 2002

Mr. Lewis (CA) asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.

Sep 10, 2002

On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection.

Sep 10, 2002

Mr. Olver moved that the House instruct conferees.

Sep 10, 2002

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the motion to instruct on H. R. 5010. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the managers on the part of the House to insist on the higher funding levels permitted within the scope of conference with regard to chemical and biological defense programs, projects, and activities.

Sep 10, 2002

On motion that the House instruct conferees Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H6137-6138)

Sep 10, 2002

The Speaker appointed conferees: Lewis (CA), Young (FL), Skeen, Hobson, Bonilla, Nethercutt, Cunningham, Frelinghuysen, Tiahrt, Murtha, Dicks, Sabo, Visclosky, Moran (VA), and Obey.

Sep 10, 2002

Mr. Lewis (CA) moved that the House close portions of the conference.

Sep 10, 2002

On motion to close portions of the conference Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 365 - 0 (Roll no. 378).

Sep 10, 2002

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sep 9, 2002

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Aug 1, 2002

Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S7793-7804)

Aug 1, 2002

The committee substitute as amended agreed to by Unanimous Consent.

Aug 1, 2002

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 95 - 3. Record Vote Number: 204.

Aug 1, 2002

Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 95 - 3. Record Vote Number: 204.

Aug 1, 2002

Senate insists on its amendment, asks for a conference, appoints conferees Inouye; Hollings; Byrd; Leahy; Harkin; Dorgan; Durbin; Reid; Feinstein; Kohl; Stevens; Cochran; Specter; Domenici; Bond; McConnell; Shelby; Gregg; Hutchison.

Jul 31, 2002

Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S7656-7705, S7709-7728; text of Title I as reported in Senate: CR S7670; text of Title II as reported in Senate: CR S7671-7672; text of Title III as reported in Senate: CR S7672-7673; text of Title IV as reported in Senate: CR S7673; text of Title V as reported in Senate: CR S7673; text of Title VI as reported in Senate: CR S7674; text of Title VII as reported in Senate: CR S7674; text of Title VIII as reported in Senate: CR S7674-7682; text of Title IX as reported in Senate: CR S7682-7683)

Jul 18, 2002

Committee on Appropriations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

Jul 18, 2002

Committee on Appropriations. Reported by Senator Inouye with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 107-213.

Jul 18, 2002

Committee on Appropriations. Reported by Senator Inouye with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 107-213.

Jul 18, 2002

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 505.

Jul 16, 2002

Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense. Approved for full committee consideration with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

Jun 28, 2002

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Jun 27, 2002

Rule H. Res. 461 passed House.

Jun 27, 2002

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 461. (consideration: CR H4079-4110, H4111-4119; text of measure as reported in House: CR H4092-4106)

Jun 27, 2002

Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5010 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. The rule waives clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized or legislative provisions in an appropriations bill) against provisions in the bill. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments. The rule authorizes the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole to accord priority in recognition to Members who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional Record. Upon adoption, it shall be order, any rule of the House to the contrary notwithstanding, to consider concurrent resolutions providing for adjournment of the House and Senate during the month of July.

Jun 27, 2002

House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 461 and Rule XXIII.

Jun 27, 2002

The Speaker designated the Honorable Dave Camp to act as Chairman of the Committee.

Jun 27, 2002

GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 5010.

Jun 27, 2002

POINT OF ORDER RESERVED - Mr. Lewis of California reserved a point of order against the Kucinich amendment.

Jun 27, 2002

DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Spratt amendment under the five-minute rule.

Jun 27, 2002

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair put the question on the adoption of the Spratt amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Lewis (CA) demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Jun 27, 2002

DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kucinich amendment under the five-minute rule.

Jun 27, 2002

DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Tierney amendment under the five-minute rule.

Jun 27, 2002

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair put the question on the adoption of the Tierney amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Tierney demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Jun 27, 2002

UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.

Jun 27, 2002

The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 5010.

Jun 27, 2002

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Jun 27, 2002

The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

Jun 27, 2002

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 413 - 18 (Roll no. 270).

Jun 27, 2002

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 413 - 18 (Roll no. 270).

Jun 27, 2002

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Jun 26, 2002

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 461 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5010 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. The rule waives clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized or legislative provisions in an appropriations bill) against provisions in the bill. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments. The rule authorizes the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole to accord priority in recognition to Members who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional Record. Upon adoption, it shall be order, any rule of the House to the contrary notwithstanding, to consider concurrent resolutions providing for adjournment of the House and Senate during the month of July.

Jun 25, 2002

Introduced in House

Jun 25, 2002

The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-532, by Mr. Lewis (CA).

Jun 25, 2002

The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-532, by Mr. Lewis (CA).

Jun 25, 2002

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 322.

Compiled law record. Law pages connect public-law records back to originating bills, sponsors, actions, subjects, and committees where the source data supports those relationships. Official government sources remain authoritative for legal status, enacted text, and effective dates.