Back to law search
PUB 104-127

Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996

Became Public Law No: 104-127.

Originating Bill

Sponsors

Timeline

Apr 4, 1996

Signed by President.

Apr 4, 1996

Signed by President.

Apr 4, 1996

Became Public Law No: 104-127.

Apr 4, 1996

Became Public Law No: 104-127.

Apr 3, 1996

Presented to President.

Apr 3, 1996

Presented to President.

Mar 29, 1996

The previous question was ordered without objection.

Mar 29, 1996

Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by recorded vote: 318 - 89 (Roll no. 107).(consideration: CR 3/28/1996 H3169)

Mar 29, 1996

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Mar 29, 1996

On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by recorded vote: 318 - 89 (Roll no. 107). (consideration: CR 3/28/1996 H3169)

Mar 28, 1996

Conference report considered in Senate. (consideration: CR H3150-3158)

Mar 28, 1996

Conference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 74-26. Record Vote No: 57.(consideration: CR S3100-3101)

Mar 28, 1996

Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 74-26. Record Vote No: 57. (consideration: CR S3100-3101)

Mar 28, 1996

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Mar 28, 1996

Rule H. Res. 393 passed House.

Mar 28, 1996

Mr. Roberts brought up conference report H. Rept. 104-494 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 393.

Mar 28, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 393, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.

Mar 27, 1996

Conference report considered in Senate. (consideration: CR S2996-3004)

Mar 27, 1996

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 393 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 2854. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill H.R. 2854. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. S. Con. Res. 49 is hereby agreed to.

Mar 25, 1996

Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 104-494 filed.(text of conference report: CR H2716-2841)

Mar 25, 1996

Conference report H. Rept. 104-494 filed. (text of conference report: CR H2716-2841)

Mar 25, 1996

Conference papers: Senate report and managers' statement and official papers held at the desk in Senate.

Mar 22, 1996

Mr. Roberts asked unanimous consent that managers on the part of the House have until midnight on March 25 to file a conference report on H.R. 2854. Agreed to without objection.

Mar 21, 1996

Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.

Mar 21, 1996

Conferees agreed to file conference report.

Mar 20, 1996

Conference committee actions: Conference held.

Mar 20, 1996

Conference held.

Mar 15, 1996

Message on House action received in Senate.

Mar 14, 1996

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Mar 14, 1996

Mr. Roberts asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.

Mar 14, 1996

On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H2304)

Mar 14, 1996

Mr. Peterson (MN) moved that the House instruct conferees.

Mar 14, 1996

DEBATE - The House proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Peterson (MN) motion to instruct conferees on the part of the House to insist on the House language regarding a program extension of the Conservation Reserve Program through the year 2002.

Mar 14, 1996

The previous question was ordered without objection.

Mar 14, 1996

On motion that the House instruct conferees Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 412 - 0 (Roll no. 67). (consideration: CR H1575)

Mar 14, 1996

The Speaker appointed conferees: Roberts, Emerson, Gunderson, Ewing, Barrett (NE), Allard, Boehner, Pombo, de la Garza, Rose, Stenholm, Volkmer, Johnson (SD), and Condit.

Mar 14, 1996

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Mar 12, 1996

Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S1889-1900)

Mar 12, 1996

Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S. 1541 amended.

Mar 12, 1996

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

Mar 12, 1996

Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

Mar 12, 1996

Senate insists on its amendment asks for a conference, appoints conferees Lugar; Dole; Helms; Cochran; McConnell; Craig; Leahy; Pryor; Heflin; Harkin; Conrad. (consideration: CR S1899)

Feb 29, 1996

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1509-1575)

Feb 29, 1996

The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.

Feb 29, 1996

The Chair announced the order of business to be the consideration of the Boehlert amendment, which was pending before the Committee of the Whole when it rose on February 28, 1996.

Feb 29, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the Boehlert amendment.

Feb 29, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with thirty minutes of debate on the Roth amendment.

Feb 29, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the Livingston amendment.

Feb 29, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Dooley amendment.

Feb 29, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with twenty minutes of debate on the Foley amendment.

Feb 29, 1996

Pursuant to the order of the House of Wednesday, February 28, 1995, Mr. Traficant was recognize to offer a substitute to the amendment made in order by H. Res. 366.

Feb 29, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded withten minutes of debate on the Traficant amendment.

Feb 29, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate on the Stenholm amendment.

Feb 29, 1996

The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2854.

Feb 29, 1996

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Feb 29, 1996

The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

Feb 29, 1996

Mr. Roberts raised a point of order against the motion to recommit with instructions. Mr. Roberts stated that the motion includes provisions in the proposed amendment which would extend reauthorization for various nutrition programs and were beyond the scope of the bill. Sustained by the Chair.

Feb 29, 1996

Point of order sustained against the motion to recommit with instructions.

Feb 29, 1996

Mr. Stenholm moved to recommit with instructions to Agriculture.

Feb 29, 1996

DEBATE - The House proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the motion.

Feb 29, 1996

On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 156 - 267 (Roll no. 41). (consideration: CR H1575)

Feb 29, 1996

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 270 - 155 (Roll no. 42).

Feb 29, 1996

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 270 - 155 (Roll no. 42).

Feb 29, 1996

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Feb 29, 1996

The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 2854.

Feb 29, 1996

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 338.

Feb 28, 1996

Mr. Volkmer asked unanimous consent that, during the consideration of the bill for amendment, it be in order to consider amendment No. 4 immediately after consideration of the Solomon/Dooley amendment No. 7. Agreed to without objection.

Feb 28, 1996

Rule H. Res. 366 passed House.

Feb 28, 1996

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 366. (consideration: CR H1415-1490)

Feb 28, 1996

Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2854 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bill and provides for consideration in the Committee of the Whole. Specified amendments are in order. It shall be in order to consider the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Agriculture now printed in the bill. All points of order against the committee substitute shall be waived. No amendment to the substitute shall be in order except those specified in the report accompanying this resolution and shall not be subject to further amendment. Said amendment amendments shall be debated in the order and manner specified. All points of order against said amendments shall be waived. It shall be in order at any time for the C...

Feb 28, 1996

House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 366 and Rule XXIII.

Feb 28, 1996

The Speaker designated the Honorable C.W. Bill Young to act as Chairman of the Committee.

Feb 28, 1996

GENERAL DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with two hours of general debate.

Feb 28, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Roberts en bloc amendments.

Feb 28, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with

Feb 28, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the Frank (MA) amendment.

Feb 28, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366,the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Chabot amendment.

Feb 28, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the Shays amendment.

Feb 28, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate on the Miller (FL) amendment.

Feb 28, 1996

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 366, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the Solomon amendment.

Feb 28, 1996

Mr. Roberts moved that the Committee rise.

Feb 28, 1996

On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.

Feb 28, 1996

Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2854 as unfinished business.

Feb 28, 1996

Mr. Traficant asked unanimous consent that, during the further consideration of the bill for amendment in the Committee of the Whole, Mr. Traficant be permitted to offer a substitute to the amendment made in order pursuant to H. Res. 366 (amendment No. 15.) Agreed to without objection.

Feb 27, 1996

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 366 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2854 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bill and provides for consideration in the Committee of the Whole. Specified amendments are in order. It shall be in order to consider the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Agriculture now printed in the bill. Allpoints of order against the committee substitute shall be waived. No amendment to the substitute shall be in order except those specified in the report accompanying this resolution and shall not be subject to further amendment. Said amendments shall be debated in the order and manner specified. All points of order against said amendments shall be waived. It shall be in order at any time for the Chairman of the...

Feb 20, 1996

Mr. Goss notified the House that the Committee on Rules planned to begin consideration of a rule providing for the consideration of the bill H.R. 2854 on February 22, 1996. Members wishing to offer amendments to the bill should submit 55 copies of their amendment to the Rules Committee no later than 3 p.m. on Tuesday, February 26, 1996. Amendments should be written to conform to the text of the bill as reported by the Committee on Agriculture on Friday, February 9, 1996 (H. Rept. 104-462).

Feb 9, 1996

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 104-462, Part I.

Feb 9, 1996

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 104-462, Part I.

Feb 9, 1996

House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Feb. 9, 1996.

Feb 9, 1996

Committee on Ways and Means discharged.

Feb 9, 1996

Committee on Ways and Means discharged.

Feb 9, 1996

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 223.

Feb 1, 1996

Mr. Roberts asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider, and that all points of order against the bill and against its consideration be waived; and that the previous question be considered as ordered without intervening motion except: 1. One hour of debate; 2. one amendment, if offered, by Rep. De La Garza, to be available for one hour.

Feb 1, 1996

The Chair announced that the unanimous consent request was in order without the prior approval of the Majority and Minority leaders.

Jan 30, 1996

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

Jan 30, 1996

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 29 - 17.

Jan 30, 1996

Unfavorable Executive Comment Received from USDA.

Jan 18, 1996

Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.

Jan 17, 1996

Executive Comment Requested from USDA.

Jan 5, 1996

Introduced in House

Compiled law record. Law pages connect public-law records back to originating bills, sponsors, actions, subjects, and committees where the source data supports those relationships. Official government sources remain authoritative for legal status, enacted text, and effective dates.