Back to search
S 1841 - 98

National Cooperative Research Act of 1984

Became Public Law No: 98-462.

Bill Text Stats

Bill text analysis is not available for this record yet.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Affected-sector context is not available for this record yet.

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

No CBO cost estimate is currently linked for this bill.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

48 Conference report filed in House Apr 4, 2004

(Conference report filed in House, H. Rept. 98-1044) National Cooperative Research Act of 1984 - Provides that a person's conduct in making or performing a contract to carry out a joint research and development venture shall not be deemed illegal per se under Federal antitrust laws or similar State laws but shall be judged on its reasonableness considering factors including its effect on competition in the relevant markets. Excludes from the definition of the term "joint research and development venture" any activity in which two or more participating parties: (1) exchange information regarding the costs, sales, profitability, prices, marketing, or distribution of any product, process, or service that is not required to conduct the research and development under such venture; (2) restrict or require the production or marketing by any party of any product, process, or service other than proprietary information developed through such venture; or (3) restrict or require other research and development activities, or the sale, licensing, or sharing of any invention or development not developed through such venture, if such a restriction or requirement is not required to prevent misappropriation of proprietary information contributed by any participant or of the results of such venture. Limits to actual damages, specified interest thereon, and the cost of suit the amount that any person or State may recover on a claim in an antitrust action under State or Federal law if the claim is: (1) based on conduct under a joint research and development venture that is described in a venture notification filed with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC); and (2) filed after such notification becomes effective. Provides that such recovery limitation shall not apply to any conduct in violation of a court order or decree issued after enactment of this Act in any State or Federal antitrust action challenging such conduct as part of such a venture. Directs the court to award the cost of litigating such a claim, including reasonable attorney fees, to: (1) a substantially prevailing claimant; or (2) a substantially prevailing defendent if the claimant's conduct during the litigation was frivolous, unreasonable, without foundation, or in bad faith. Authorizes such an award to be offset by an award in favor of any other party for any part of the cost of litigation attributable to conduct during the litigation by any prevailing party that the court finds to be frivolous, unreasonable, without foundation, or in bad faith. Permits any party to a joint research and development venture, in order to qualify for such limited recovery protection, to file with the Attorney General and the FTC within a specified period a notification disclosing the parties to such venture and the nature and objectiveness of the venture. Requires the venture to file a notification of any change of membership within 90 days after such change. Directs the Attorney General or the FTC, within 30 days after receiving such notification, to publish in the Federal Register a notice identifying the parties to such venture and the area of planned activity of such venture. Provides that such a notification shall be effective as of the earlier of: (1) the date of expiration of such 30-day period, provided the notice is published eventually; or (2) the date the notice is published. Exempts from public disclosure all material submitted as part of such a notification and all information obtained by the Attorney General or the FTC in any investigation, administrative proceeding, or case concerning an antitrust violation by a venture for which such a notification was filed.

36 Passed House amended Apr 4, 2004

(Measure passed House, amended (inserted text of H.R. 5041 as passed House)) Joint Research and Development Act of 1984 - Declares that no joint research and development venture shall be deemed illegal per se under the Federal antitrust laws or under any similar State law. Excludes from the term "joint research and development venture" any activity in which two or more participating parties: (1) exchange information regarding the sales, marketing, or distribution of any product, process, or service; or (2) restrict or require the participation by any party in another research and development program, the production or marketing by any party of any product, process, or service, or the sale, licensing, or sharing by any party of any invention or development neither developed by such venture nor integrally related to a product or process developed by such venture. Permits any party to a joint research and development venture to file with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) a written notice disclosing: (1) the parties to such venture; and (2) the nature, objectives, and duration of the venture. Directs the Attorney General or the FTC, within 60 days after receiving such notice, to publish in the Federal Register a notice identifying the parties to such venture and the area of planned activity and duration of such venture. Exempts material submitted as part of such notices from public disclosure. Limits the amount that may be recovered on a claim brought by a person or by a State on behalf of its residents for an injury to business or property sustained as a result of a violation of a State or Federal antitrust law, to the amount of the actual damages sustained, interest on such damages from the date the action is filed or from the date of injury, as specified, and the cost of the suit, if: (1) the claim is based on conduct under a joint research and development venture that is described in the venture notice filed with the Attorney General and the FTC; and (2) such claim is filed after such notice is published in the Federal Register. Provides that such recovery limitation shall not apply to any conduct that occurs during the effective period of any court order enjoining such conduct as a result of a claim under Federal or State antitrust law. Directs the court to award the prevailing party on such claim the cost of litigation, including reasonable attorney's fees. Provides that such award may be reduced or withheld in the interest of justice, or reduced by an award in favor of any other party.

35 Passed Senate amended Apr 4, 2004

(Measure passed Senate, amended, roll call #209 (97-0)) Title I: Short Title - Declares that this Act may be cited as the National Productivity and Innovation Act of 1983. Title II: Joint Research and Development Ventures - Provides that a person's conduct in making or performing a contract to carry out a joint research and development program shall not be deemed illegal per se under State or Federal antitrust laws but shall be judged on its reasonableness considering factors including its effect on competition in the relevant markets. Excludes from the definition of a "joint research and development program": (1) joint production or marketing of any product or service, other than patents, know-how, or other proprietary information developed through the program; (2) the exchange of information among competitors concerning costs, sales, profitability, or prices that is not required to conduct program research and development; or (3) any restriction on other research and development activities, or on the sale, licensing, or sharing of inventions or developments not developed through such program, that is not required to prevent misappropriation of proprietary information contributed by any participant or of the results of such program. Limits to actual damages, interest thereon, and the cost of suit the amount that any person or State may recover in an antitrust action (under Federal or State law) based on conduct of such a program, if the action is filed after the program has been disclosed to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. Provides that such limitation shall apply only if the challenged conduct is not in violation of any court order or decree issued in any antitrust action. Authorizes any person who is a party to such a program to file with the Attorney General and the Commission within 90 days after the formation of the program or 90 days after enactment of this Act, whichever is later, a notification identifying the parties to the program. Directs the Commission to publish a notice identifying the parties to such program in the Federal Register within 60 days after receiving such notification. Exempts information submitted as part of a notification, except the information published in the Federal Register, from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Allows an individual to withdraw a filed notification before it is published. Exempts any actions of the Attorney General or the Commission concerning such notifications from judicial review.

01 Reported to Senate with amendment(s) Apr 4, 2004

(Reported to Senate from the Committee on the Judiciary with amendment, S. Rept. 98-427) Title I: Short Title - Declares that this Act may be cited as the National Productivity and Innovation Act of 1983. Title II: Joint Research and Development Ventures - Provides that a person's conduct in making or performing a contract to carry out a joint research and development program shall not be deemed illegal per se under State or Federal antitrust laws but shall be judged on its reasonableness considering factors including its effect on competition in the relevant markets. Excludes from the definition of a "joint research and development program": (1) joint production or marketing of any product or service, other than patents, know-how, or other proprietary information developed through the program; (2) the exchange of information among competitors concerning costs, sales, profitability, or prices that is not required to conduct program research and development; or (3) any restriction on other research and development activities, or on the sale, licensing, or sharing of inventions or developments not developed through such program, that is not required to prevent misappropriation of proprietary information contributed by any participant or of the results of such program. Limits to actual damages, interest thereon, and the cost of suit the amount that any person or State may recover in an antitrust action (under Federal or State law) based on conduct that is within the scope of such a program, if the action is filed after the program has been disclosed to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. Authorizes any person who is a party to such a program to file with the Attorney General and the Commission within 90 days after the formation of the program or 90 days after enactment of this Act, whichever is later, a notification identifying the parties to, and the nature and objectives of, the program. Directs the Commission to publish a notice of such program in the Federal Register within 60 days after receiving such notification. Requires that such notice identify the parties, describe the program in general terms, and exclude privileged or confidential financial information. Exempts information submitted as part of a notification, except the information published in the Federal Register, from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Allows an individual to withdraw a filed notification before it is published. Exempts any actions of the Attorney General or the Commission concerning such notifications from judicial review.

00 Introduced in Senate Apr 4, 2004

Title I: Short Title - Declares that this Act may be cited as the National Productivity and Innovation Act of 1983. Title II: Joint Research and Development Ventures - Provides that no joint research and development program shall be deemed illegal per se in any action under the antitrust laws. Limits to actual damages, interest thereon, and the cost of suit the amount that any person or State may recover in an antitrust action based on conduct that is part of such a program and that has been disclosed to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. Authorizes any individual participating in such a program to file with the Attorney General and the Commission a notification describing the program and specifying conduct to be performed under the program. Directs the Commission to publish in the Federal Register a notice of each such notification, including a description of the participants, the program, and its objectives. Declares that material submitted as part of such notification shall be available to the public upon request, unless the Attorney General or the Commission determines that the individual who submitted the notification shows good cause for not disclosing certain material. Allows an individual to withdraw a filed notification before it is published and accompanying material is made publicly available. Exempts actions and determinations of the Attorney General or the Commission concerning such notifications or antitrust actions or investigations from judicial review. Title III: Intellectual Property Licensing Under the Antitrust Laws - Amends the Clayton Act to provide that agreements to convey rights to use, practice, or sublicense patented inventions, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks, know-how, or other intellectual property shall not be deemed illegal per se in actions under the antitrust laws. Limits to actual damages, interest thereon, and the cost of suit the amount that any person or State may recover in an antitrust action based on such an agreement. Title IV: Patent and Copyright Misuse - Prohibits a patent or copyright owner who is entitled to relief for patent or copyright infringement from being denied relief or being deemed guilty of misuse or illegal extension of the patent right or copyright by reason of doing any of the following, unless such conduct violates the antitrust laws: (1) licensing the patent or copyright under terms that affect commerce outside the scope of its claims; (2) restricting a licensee in the sale of a patented or copyrighted product; (3) obligating a licensee to pay excessive royalties, royalties that differ from those paid by other licensees, or royalties not related to a licensee's sale of the patented or copyrighted product; (4) refusing to license a patent or copyright to any person; or (5) otherwise using the patent or copyright allegedly to suppress competition. Title V: Process Patents - Requires a process patent to grant the patentee the right to exclude others from using or selling products produced by that process. Includes as patent infringement the unauthorized use or sale of a product of a patented process. Places the burden of proving that a product was not produced by the patented process on the defendant in a patent infringement action if the court finds that: (1) a substantial likelihood exists that the product was produced by that process; and (2) the claimant has exhausted all reasonable means of determining the process used and was unable to make such determination.

Sponsors

Timeline

Oct 11, 1984

Signed by President.

Oct 11, 1984

Signed by President.

Oct 11, 1984

Became Public Law No: 98-462.

Oct 11, 1984

Became Public Law No: 98-462.

Oct 3, 1984

Measure Signed in Senate.

Oct 3, 1984

Presented to President.

Oct 3, 1984

Presented to President.

Oct 1, 1984

Conference report agreed to in House: House Agreed to Conference Report by Voice Vote.

Oct 1, 1984

House Agreed to Conference Report by Voice Vote.

Sep 26, 1984

Conference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Voice Vote.

Sep 26, 1984

Senate agreed to conference report by Voice Vote.

Sep 21, 1984

Conference report filed: Conference Report 98-1044 Filed in House.

Sep 21, 1984

Conference Report 98-1044 Filed in House.

Sep 20, 1984

Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.

Sep 20, 1984

Conferees agreed to file conference report.

Aug 10, 1984

Additional Conferee Gregg Appointed to the Conference Committee by the Speaker of the House.

Aug 9, 1984

Called up by House by Unanimous Consent.

Aug 9, 1984

Passed/agreed to in House: Passed House (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Aug 9, 1984

Passed House (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Aug 9, 1984

House Incorporated H.R.5041 in This Measure as an Amendment.

Aug 9, 1984

Resolving differences -- House actions: House Insisted on its Amendments by Voice Vote.

Aug 9, 1984

House Insisted on its Amendments by Voice Vote.

Aug 9, 1984

House Requested a Conference and Speaker Appointed Conferees: Rodino, Brooks, Edwards (CA), Seiberling, Hughes, Synar, Crockett, Schumer, Feighan, Fuqua, Fish, Moorhead, Hyde, Sawyer, Lungren.

Aug 9, 1984

Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate disagreed to the House amendments by Voice Vote.

Aug 9, 1984

Senate disagreed to the House amendments by Voice Vote.

Aug 9, 1984

Senate agreed to request for conference. Appointed conferees. Thurmond; Mathias; Hatch; Dole; Biden; Metzenbaum; Leahy.

Jul 31, 1984

Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.

Jul 31, 1984

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 97-0. Record Vote No: 209.

Jul 31, 1984

Passed Senate with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 97-0. Record Vote No: 209.

May 3, 1984

Committee on Judiciary. Reported to Senate by Senator Thurmond with an amendment. With written report No. 98-427. Additional views filed.

May 3, 1984

Committee on Judiciary. Reported to Senate by Senator Thurmond with an amendment. With written report No. 98-427. Additional views filed.

May 3, 1984

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 842.

Apr 3, 1984

Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 98-1008.

Mar 22, 1984

Committee on Judiciary. Approved for reporting, subject to agreement.

Mar 12, 1984

Committee on Judiciary. Hearings concluded. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 98-972.

Oct 26, 1983

Committee on Judiciary. Hearings held.

Sep 14, 1983

Introduced in Senate

Sep 14, 1983

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Amendments

No amendment records are currently available for this bill.
Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.