Back to search
SRES 772 - 119

A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that under no circumstances should Samuel Bankman-Fried receive executive clemency, including a pardon or commutation, and affirming the Senate's commitment to the rule of law and integrity of the United States financial system.

Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4117)

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

Bill Text Stats

2
Analyzed sections
$22.0B
Detected dollar total
0
Tax signals
0
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%
Spending density 200.0%
Spending 4
Courts 1

Top agencies

N/A

Statutory references

N/A

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

Jul 15, 2026

Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.

Jul 15, 2026

Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.

Jul 15, 2026

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.

Jul 15, 2026

Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4117)

Jun 17, 2026

Submitted in Senate

Jun 17, 2026

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2896)

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Finance and banking
6 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 85%

Fraud offenses and financial crimes

District Court in FTX customer funds to Alameda Research, which he used as his personal piggy bank, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission; Whereas, on March 28, 2024, United States District Court Judge Lewis A. Kaplan sentence

District Court funds to Alameda Research, which he used as his personal ``piggy bank'', according to the Securities and Exchange Commission; Whereas, on March 28, 2024, United States District Court Judge Lewis A. Kaplan sentenced Bankman-Fr

Housing and real estate
6 evidence matches
Impact 96% Confidence 80%

nd lenders to Alameda Research lost more than $1,300,000,000; Whereas Bankman-Fried and his co-conspirators used stolen customer funds to purchase luxury real estate in the Bahamas, provide personal loans to himself and associates, and fund

00,000,000, equity investors lost more than $1,700,000,000, and lenders to Alameda Research lost more than $1,300,000,000; Whereas Bankman-Fried and his co-conspirators used stolen customer funds to purchase luxury real estate in the Bahama

1,700,000,000, and lenders to Alameda Research lost more than $1,300,000,000; Whereas Bankman-Fried and his co-conspirators used stolen customer funds to purchase luxury real estate in the Bahamas, provide personal loans to himself and asso

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

No CBO cost estimate is currently linked for this bill.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

No official summary is currently available for this bill.

Sponsors

Gallego, Ruben
Sponsor

Gallego, Ruben

Democratic · AZ-7 · G000574

Joined Jun 17, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
302 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510
Lummis, Cynthia M.
Cosponsor

Lummis, Cynthia M.

Republican · WY-0 · L000571

Joined Jun 17, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
127A Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510

Amendments

No amendment records are currently available for this bill.
Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.