Back to search
HRES 198 - 119

Providing for the expenses of certain committees of the House of Representatives in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

Bill Text Stats

9
Analyzed sections
$794.6M
Detected dollar total
0
Tax signals
0
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%
Spending density 744.4%
Spending 67

Top agencies

N/A

Statutory references

N/A

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

Mar 24, 2025

Mr. Steil asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.

Mar 24, 2025

Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H1215-1216)

Mar 24, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Agreed to without objection. (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H1215-1216)

Mar 24, 2025

On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Agreed to without objection. (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H1215-1216)

Mar 24, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Mar 18, 2025

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on House Administration. H. Rept. 119-17.

Mar 18, 2025

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on House Administration. H. Rept. 119-17.

Mar 18, 2025

Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 9.

Mar 11, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Mar 11, 2025

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Mar 6, 2025

Submitted in House

Mar 6, 2025

Submitted in House

Mar 6, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Energy
145 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 88%

House Committee on Energy and Commerce

in subsection (a) are: Committee on Agriculture, $14,903,700; Committee on Armed Services, $25,977,070; Committee on the Budget, $11,990,000; Committee on Education and Workforce, $20,159,000; Committee on Energy and Commerce, $28,800,000;

lture, $14,903,700; Committee on Armed Services, $25,977,070; Committee on the Budget, $11,990,000; Committee on Education and Workforce, $20,159,000; Committee on Energy and Commerce, $28,800,000; Committee on Ethics, $9,276,290; Committee

Finance and banking
145 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 85%

House Committee on Financial Services

Services, $25,977,070; Committee on the Budget, $11,990,000; Committee on Education and Workforce, $20,159,000; Committee on Energy and Commerce, $28,800,000; Committee on Ethics, $9,276,290; Committee on Financial Services, $21,250,000; C

1,990,000; Committee on Education and Workforce, $20,159,000; Committee on Energy and Commerce, $28,800,000; Committee on Ethics, $9,276,290; Committee on Financial Services, $21,250,000; Committee on Foreign Affairs, $22,700,000; Committee

Education
127 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 88%

House Committee on Education and the Workforce

in subsection (a) are: Committee on Agriculture, $14,903,700; Committee on Armed Services, $25,977,070; Committee on the Budget, $11,990,000; Committee on Education and Workforce, $20,159,000; Committee on Energy and Commerce, $28,800,000;

Agriculture, $14,903,700; Committee on Armed Services, $25,977,070; Committee on the Budget, $11,990,000; Committee on Education and Workforce, $20,159,000; Committee on Energy and Commerce, $28,800,000; Committee on Ethics, $9,276,290; Co

Transportation
91 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 88%

House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

$26,600,000 he Chinese Communist Party, $10,250,000; Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, $22,854,319; Committee on Veterans' Affairs, $11,916,000; and Committee on Ways and Means, $26,600,000.

nology, $18,617,085; Committee on Small Business, $8,629,846; Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party, $10,740,218; Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, $23,290,035;

Technology and data privacy
13 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 84%

House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

ligence, $9,538,983; Committee on the Judiciary, $15,857,000; Committee on Natural Resources, $9,655,800; Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, $15,907,947; Committee on Rules, $4,272,198; Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

ligence, $9,701,945; Committee on the Judiciary, $15,857,000; Committee on Natural Resources, $9,655,800; Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, $16,956,666; Committee on Rules, $4,272,198; Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

Small business
1 evidence matches
Impact 96% Confidence 90%

House Committee on Small Business

Agriculture
1 evidence matches
Impact 93% Confidence 88%

House Committee on Agriculture

Defense
1 evidence matches
Impact 86% Confidence 80%

House Committee on Homeland Security

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

No CBO cost estimate is currently linked for this bill.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

No official summary is currently available for this bill.

Sponsors

Steil, Bryan
Sponsor

Steil, Bryan

Republican · WI-1 · S001213

Joined Mar 6, 2025
Website
N/A
Office
1526 Longworth House Office Building

Amendments

1 amendment
119/hamdt/9 Mar 24, 2025

Amendment is the reported version of the resolution, House Report 119-17 as reported by the Committee on House Administration.

On agreeing to the Steil amendment (A001) Agreed to without objection.

Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.