Back to search
HR 9340 - 119

Ratepayer Protection Act

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate. (CR S5199)

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

Bill Text Stats

5
Analyzed sections
N/A
Detected dollar total
0
Tax signals
2
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%
Spending density 0.0%
Statutory Reference 3
Amendments 2
Deadline 2

Top agencies

N/A

Statutory references

16 U.S.C. 2621 1
16 U.S.C. 2622 1
16 U.S.C. 2634 1

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

Sep 30, 2026

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S5199)

Sep 30, 2026

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate. (CR S5199)

Sep 30, 2026

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate.

Sep 30, 2026

Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 57 - 43. Record Vote Number: 254.

Sep 30, 2026

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate.

Sep 29, 2026

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate.

Sep 29, 2026

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S5186)

Sep 28, 2026

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S5065)

Sep 28, 2026

Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (CR S5065)

Sep 24, 2026

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 684.

Sep 23, 2026

Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.

Sep 17, 2026

Received in the Senate.

Sep 16, 2026

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5958-5959)

Sep 16, 2026

Considered as unfinished business.

Sep 16, 2026

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 417 - 3 (Roll no. 312). (text: CR H5656-5657)

Sep 16, 2026

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 417 - 3 (Roll no. 312). (text: CR H5656-5657)

Sep 16, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sep 15, 2026

Mr. Guthrie moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

Sep 15, 2026

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5656-5661)

Sep 15, 2026

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 9340.

Sep 15, 2026

At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

Sep 10, 2026

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-814.

Sep 10, 2026

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-814.

Sep 10, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 713.

Jul 21, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jul 21, 2026

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 52 - 0.

Jul 20, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jun 24, 2026

Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jun 24, 2026

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

Jun 18, 2026

Introduced in House

Jun 18, 2026

Introduced in House

Jun 18, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Jun 18, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Energy
45 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 92%

Energy

Energy

Energy efficiency and conservation

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

07 Reported to House Sep 14, 2026

Ratepayer Protection Act The bill requires state utility regulators and nonregulated utilities to consider implementing a standard to hold certain large-load customers responsible for the costs associated with any generation, transmission, or distribution upgrade of electric service necessary to serve such customers. A large-load customer means a non-residential electric consumer that enters, or requests to enter, an agreement concerning the sale of electric energy primarily to operate information technology infrastructure and related systems pertaining to data storage and computational applications and services (e.g., data centers) that have a peak electric demand of 100 megawatts or more at a single site or campus. Specifically, the bill requires states to consider implementing a federal standard for large-load customers. The standard must require rates charged by electric utilities for providing electric service to a large-load customer to be designed to recover from the large-load customer the full, incremental cost of any generation, transmission, or distribution upgrade necessary to serve such customer. This rate must include the costs that would be incurred if the large-load customer terminates an agreement with the electric utility pertaining to the sale of electric energy or otherwise ceases the purchase of energy from the electric utility. Under the standard, an electric utility must require the large-load customer to provide to the utility financial assurances or contributions to cover the cost of any generation, transmission, or distribution upgrade that is necessary to serve the load of a large-load customer before the utility makes any generation, transmission, or distribution upgrade.

Sponsors

Joyce, John
Cosponsor

Joyce, John

Republican · PA-13 · J000302

Joined Jun 25, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
2102 Rayburn House Office Building
Cuellar, Henry
Cosponsor

Cuellar, Henry

Democratic · TX-28 · C001063

Joined Aug 17, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
2308 Rayburn House Office Building
Boebert, Lauren
Cosponsor

Boebert, Lauren

Republican · CO-3 · B000825

Joined Aug 27, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
1713 Longworth House Office Building
Van Duyne, Beth
Cosponsor

Van Duyne, Beth

Republican · TX-24 · V000134

Joined Aug 27, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
1725 Longworth House Office Building
Finstad, Brad
Cosponsor

Finstad, Brad

Republican · MN-1 · F000475

Joined Aug 31, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
2418 Rayburn House Office Building
Moore, Riley M.
Cosponsor

Moore, Riley M.

Republican · WV-2 · M001235

Joined Aug 31, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
1337 Longworth House Office Building
Jordan, Jim
Cosponsor

Jordan, Jim

Republican · OH-4 · J000289

Joined Sep 1, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
2056 Rayburn House Office Building
Barrett, Tom
Cosponsor

Barrett, Tom

Republican · MI-7 · B001321

Joined Sep 10, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
1232 Longworth House Office Building
Fallon, Pat
Cosponsor

Fallon, Pat

Republican · TX-4 · F000246

Joined Sep 10, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
2416 Rayburn House Office Building
Flood, Mike
Cosponsor

Flood, Mike

Republican · NE-1 · F000474

Joined Sep 10, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
343 Cannon House Office Building
Huizenga, Bill
Cosponsor

Huizenga, Bill

Republican · MI-4 · H001058

Joined Sep 10, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
2232 Rayburn House Office Building

Amendments

4 amendments
Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.