HR 9333 - 119

AI Flaw Reporting and Security Enhancement Act

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 35 - 0.

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

House votes

None linked

No House roll call vote is attached to this bill yet.

5 sectors

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

View timeline

Bill Text Stats

Analyzed sections

N/A

Detected dollar total

Tax signals

Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%

Spending density 0.0%

Statutory Reference 5

Benefits 3

Deadline 1

Privacy 1

Top agencies

N/A

Statutory references

15 U.S.C. 638 1

15 U.S.C. 9401 1

20 U.S.C. 1001 1

40 U.S.C. 11301 1

Public Law 117-263 1

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

Jun 25, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jun 25, 2026

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 35 - 0.

Jun 18, 2026

Introduced in House

Jun 18, 2026

Introduced in House

Jun 18, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Education

16 evidence matches

Impact 100% Confidence 80%

on Act for Fiscal Year 2023; Public Law 117–263 ). (4) Eligible entity The term eligible entity means an institution of higher education (as such term is defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1001 )), a r

for Fiscal Year 2023; Public Law 117–263 ). (4) Eligible entity The term eligible entity means an institution of higher education (as such term is defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1001 )), a research

Technology and data privacy

16 evidence matches

Impact 100% Confidence 84%

Computers and information technology

Technology assessment

into cooperative agreements with one or more eligible entity designated by the Director to develop, infrastructure for the voluntary reporting, collection, and tracking of artificial intelligence flaws. Such infrastructure shall include a n

Telecom and broadband

3 evidence matches

Impact 98% Confidence 86%

Science, Technology, Communications

AI Flaw Reporting and Security Enhancement Act Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 35 - 0. Science, Technology, Communications

Defense

7 evidence matches

Impact 97% Confidence 80%

igible entity t ( 40 U.S.C. 11301 note; as enacted as part of title LXXII of division G of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023; Public Law 117–263 ). (4) Eligible entity The term eligible entity means

eligible entity as enacted as part of title LXXII of division G of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023; Public Law 117–263 ). (4) Eligible entity The term eligible entity means an institution of highe

Eligible entity s enacted as part of title LXXII of division G of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023; Public Law 117-263). (4) Eligible entity.--The term ``eligible entity'' means an institution of h

Small business

3 evidence matches

Impact 94% Confidence 82%

cation (as such term is defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1001 )), a research institution (as such term is defined in section 9 of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 638(e)(8) ), or consortia thereof.

15 U.S.C. 638 term is defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1001 )), a research institution (as such term is defined in section 9 of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 638(e)(8) ), or consortia thereof.

15 U.S.C. 638 section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(e)(8)), or consortia thereof.

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

No CBO cost estimate is currently linked for this bill.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

00 Introduced in House Jul 24, 2026

AI Flaw Reporting and Security Enhancement Act This bill establishes a program to facilitate the voluntary reporting and tracking of artificial intelligence (AI) flaws, to be administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). In carrying out this program, NIST must seek to convene various stakeholders to establish common definitions for terms related to AI flaws and criteria for the classification of AI flaws (e.g., security-related flaws and safety-related flaws). The group must also support the development of technical standards and guidance related to detecting, managing, and disclosing AI flaws and prioritizing the remediation of such flaws. Further, NIST must develop, or enter into cooperative agreements with institutions of higher education or research institutions to develop, infrastructure for the voluntary reporting, collection, and tracking of AI flaws. This must include a national database of AI flaws or the modification of an existing national database to account for AI flaws. (NIST currently administers a national database of cybersecurity vulnerabilities.) NIST must consider certain topics when developing this infrastructure, including the interoperability of the infrastructure with relevant existing systems, standards, and best practices. Within three years of the bill’s enactment, NIST must report to Congress on the implementation of these provisions. Under the bill, an AI flaw is a set of conditions or behaviors that allow for the violation of certain policies (e.g., safety or security policies) and is not necessarily associated with malicious intent.

Amendments

No amendment records are currently available for this bill.

Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.

Disclaimer Report issue

AI Flaw Reporting and Security Enhancement Act