Back to search
HR 7890 - 119

Science of Reading Act of 2026

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

Bill Text Stats

6
Analyzed sections
N/A
Detected dollar total
0
Tax signals
0
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%
Spending density 0.0%
Statutory Reference 9
Amendments 7

Top agencies

N/A

Statutory references

20 U.S.C. 6642 2
20 U.S.C. 1400 1
20 U.S.C. 6301 1
20 U.S.C. 6641 1
20 U.S.C. 6643 1
20 U.S.C. 6644 1
29 U.S.C. 794 1
42 U.S.C. 12101 1

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

Sep 17, 2026

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Sep 16, 2026

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5911-5913)

Sep 16, 2026

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5911)

Sep 16, 2026

Mr. Walberg moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

Sep 16, 2026

Considered under suspension of the rules.

Sep 16, 2026

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 7890.

Sep 16, 2026

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

Sep 16, 2026

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

Sep 16, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Jun 29, 2026

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-717.

Jun 29, 2026

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-717.

Jun 29, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 623.

Mar 17, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Mar 17, 2026

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 33 - 0.

Mar 12, 2026

Introduced in House

Mar 12, 2026

Introduced in House

Mar 12, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Education
90 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 92%

Education

Education

Education programs funding

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

No CBO cost estimate is currently linked for this bill.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

07 Reported to House Jul 14, 2026

Science of Reading Act of 2026 This bill revises the Comprehensive Literacy State Development (CLSD) grant program to prioritize literacy instruction that is aligned to the science of reading. Under the bill, science of reading is defined as an interdisciplinary body of evidence-based research about reading and issues related to reading and writing that (1) identifies instruction in phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, and writing as essential components to skilled reading; (2) demonstrates the importance of background knowledge, oral language, the connection between reading and writing, and strong writing instruction; (3) explains why some students have difficulty with reading and writing; and (4) does not use a three-cueing model. Three-cueing model means an instructional approach or model that (1) uses meaning drawn from context, pictures, or syntax as the primary basis for teaching word recognition; or (2) teaches visual memory as the primary basis for word recognition. Current law authorizes competitive CLSD grants to state educational agencies (SEAs) and, through them, competitive subgrants to local educational agencies for the development and implementation of a comprehensive literacy instruction plan, professional development, and other activities. Eligible early childhood education programs may also receive subgrants for early literacy services. The bill (1) specifies that comprehensive literacy instruction for CLSD grants does not include the use of a three-cueing model, and (2) requires the Department of Education and SEAs to prioritize awarding CLSD grants and subgrants for evidence-based activities that are aligned to the science of reading.

Sponsors

Houchin, Erin
Sponsor

Houchin, Erin

Republican · IN-9 · H001093

Joined Mar 12, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
342 Cannon House Office Building
Foxx, Virginia
Cosponsor

Foxx, Virginia

Republican · NC-5 · F000450

Joined Mar 18, 2026
Website
N/A
Office
2462 Rayburn House Office Building

Amendments

No amendment records are currently available for this bill.
Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.