Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Standing Senate
Homeland Security Committee Standing House
Secretary of Homeland Security shall publish secretary of homeland security shall publish
HR 275 - 119Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.
Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.
Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.
Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.
Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Standing Senate
Homeland Security Committee Standing House
Secretary of Homeland Security shall publish secretary of homeland security shall publish
Secretary of Homeland Security to publish on a monthly Union Calendar No. 130 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 275 [Report No. 119-163] To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to publish on a monthly basis the number of special intere
Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.
CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.
LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.
CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.
Official USAspending.gov award records for agencies connected through bill-text agency signals. This helps show the existing agency spending landscape around the bill, not spending caused by the bill.
USAspending records describe federal awards, grants, contracts, loans, direct payments, recipients, agencies, and dates reported through the official public spending system.
LawLinter links this context through agency names detected in bill text. That bridge is a research shortcut and should not be read as a legal or budget conclusion.
USAspending context shows official public award records for agencies connected through LawLinter bill-text agency signals. It is historical spending and award context only, not proof that this bill caused, authorized, required, or changed any award, grant, contract, payment, or program spending.
Amounts reflect the local USAspending sample linked through agency text signals, not bill-caused spending.
These bars summarize the visible sampled awards below so large awards are easier to scan.
Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.
Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.
They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.
If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.
Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.
Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.
LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.
A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.
Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.
![Rep. Greene, Marjorie Taylor [R-GA-14]](https://www.congress.gov/img/member/g000596_200.jpg)
![Rep. Brecheen, Josh [R-OK-2]](https://www.congress.gov/img/member/b001317_200.jpg)
![Rep. Crane, Elijah [R-AZ-2]](https://www.congress.gov/img/member/c001132_200.jpg)
![Rep. Green, Mark E. [R-TN-7]](https://www.congress.gov/img/member/g000590_200.jpg)
![Rep. Guest, Michael [R-MS-3]](https://www.congress.gov/img/member/g000591_200.jpg)
![Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]](https://www.congress.gov/img/member/h001077_200.jpg)
![Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]](https://www.congress.gov/img/member/p000048_200.jpg)
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 530. (consideration: CR H2989-2993)
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3944, H.R. 275, H.R. 875 and H. Res. 516. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3944 under a structured rule and H.R. 275, H.R. 875, and H.Res. 516 under a closed rule, with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3944, H.R. 275, and H.R. 875.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 275.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 275, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Correa demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2994-2995)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 231 - 182 (Roll no. 184). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2989)
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 231 - 182 (Roll no. 184). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2989)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
CORRECTION TO ENGROSSMENT - Ms. Greene (GA) asked unanimous consent that in the engrossment of H.R. 275, the Clerk be directed to make corrections, which were placed at the desk. Agreed to without objection.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 530 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3944, H.R. 275, H.R. 875 and H. Res. 516. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3944 under a structured rule and H.R. 275, H.R. 875, and H.Res. 516 under a closed rule, with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3944, H.R. 275, and H.R. 875.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 119-163.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 119-163.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 130.
Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement Discharged
Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence Discharged
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 12.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 530, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Homeland Security now printed in the bill is considered as adopted.
On agreeing to the Rules amendment (A001) Agreed to without objection.