Back to search
HR 1526 - 119

NORRA of 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

Bill Text Stats

4
Analyzed sections
N/A
Detected dollar total
0
Tax signals
0
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%
Spending density 0.0%
Courts 3

Top agencies

N/A

Statutory references

N/A

House Votes

Roll call 98 · Session 1 · Apr 9, 2025
On Passage
Passed
219
Yea
213
Nay
0
Present
1
NV

Timeline

Apr 10, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Apr 9, 2025

Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the House resumed consideration of H.R. 1526.

Apr 9, 2025

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1550-1552)

Apr 9, 2025

Ms. Ross moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H1550-1551)

Apr 9, 2025

The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.

Apr 9, 2025

On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 217 (Roll no. 97).

Apr 9, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 98).

Apr 9, 2025

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 98).

Apr 9, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Apr 8, 2025

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 294. (consideration: CR H1482; text: CR H1482)

Apr 8, 2025

Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.

Apr 8, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 1526.

Apr 8, 2025

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Apr 8, 2025

The Chair announced that pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, further proceedings on H.R. 1526 are postponed.

Apr 7, 2025

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 294 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.

Apr 1, 2025

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 282 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution also provides that H. Res. 23 and H. Res. 164 are laid on the table.

Mar 25, 2025

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-40.

Mar 25, 2025

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-40.

Mar 25, 2025

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 27.

Mar 5, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Mar 5, 2025

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 9.

Feb 24, 2025

Introduced in House

Feb 24, 2025

Introduced in House

Feb 24, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Affected-sector context is not available for this record yet.

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

00 Introduced in House Mar 28, 2025

No Rogue Rulings Act or NORRA This bill limits the authority of federal district courts to issue injunctions. Specifically, it prohibits a district court from issuing an injunction unless the injunction applies only to the parties of the particular case before the court.

Sponsors

Issa, Darrell
Sponsor

Issa, Darrell

Republican · CA-50 · I000056

Joined Feb 24, 2025
Website
N/A
Office
2108 Rayburn House Office Building
Gooden, Lance
Cosponsor

Gooden, Lance

Republican · TX-5 · G000589

Joined Mar 21, 2025
Website
N/A
Office
2431 Rayburn House Office Building
Harris, Mark
Cosponsor

Harris, Mark

Republican · NC-8 · H001102

Joined Mar 21, 2025
Website
N/A
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building
Higgins, Clay
Cosponsor

Higgins, Clay

Republican · LA-3 · H001077

Joined Mar 24, 2025
Website
N/A
Office
572 Cannon House Office Building
Meuser, Daniel
Cosponsor

Meuser, Daniel

Republican · PA-9 · M001204

Joined Mar 24, 2025
Website
N/A
Office
350 Cannon House Office Building
Babin, Brian
Cosponsor

Babin, Brian

Republican · TX-36 · B001291

Joined Mar 25, 2025
Website
N/A
Office
2236 Rayburn House Office Building
LaLota, Nick
Cosponsor

LaLota, Nick

Republican · NY-1 · L000598

Joined Mar 25, 2025
Website
N/A
Office
122 Cannon House Office Building

Amendments

1 amendment
119/hamdt/16 Apr 8, 2025

Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 294, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill is considered adopted.

On agreeing to the Rules amendment (A001) Agreed to without objection.

Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.