Back to search
S 3613 - 118

Improving Federal Building Security Act of 2024

Became Public Law No: 118-157.

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

Bill Text Stats

4
Analyzed sections
N/A
Detected dollar total
0
Tax signals
7
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%
Spending density 25.0%
Deadline 7
Statutory Reference 3
Benefits 2
Spending 1

Top agencies

N/A

Statutory references

40 USC 1315 1
Public Law 118-157 1
section 551 of title 5 1

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

Dec 17, 2024

Signed by President.

Dec 17, 2024

Signed by President.

Dec 17, 2024

Became Public Law No: 118-157.

Dec 17, 2024

Became Public Law No: 118-157.

Dec 12, 2024

Presented to President.

Dec 12, 2024

Presented to President.

Dec 10, 2024

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6557-6558)

Dec 10, 2024

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 410 - 6 (Roll no. 496). (text: 12/9/2024 CR H6529-6530)

Dec 10, 2024

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 410 - 6 (Roll no. 496). (text: 12/9/2024 CR H6529-6530)

Dec 10, 2024

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Dec 9, 2024

Mr. Graves (LA) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

Dec 9, 2024

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6529-6530)

Dec 9, 2024

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 3613.

Dec 9, 2024

At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

Mar 26, 2024

Received in the House.

Mar 26, 2024

Held at the desk.

Mar 25, 2024

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Mar 23, 2024

Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S2617-2618)

Mar 23, 2024

The committee substitute withdrawn by Unanimous Consent.

Mar 23, 2024

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

Mar 23, 2024

Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR S2617-2618)

Mar 14, 2024

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Peters with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 118-160.

Mar 14, 2024

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Peters with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 118-160.

Mar 14, 2024

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 347.

Jan 31, 2024

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

Jan 18, 2024

Introduced in Senate

Jan 18, 2024

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Defense
48 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 78%

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Standing Senate

Secretary of Homeland Security secretary of homeland security

Secretary of Homeland Security secretary of homeland security

Technology and data privacy
21 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 76%

n an annual basis on the findings of the most recently submitted report under paragraph (1). (d) Report on Surveillance Technology.— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committe

Sunset ded use of the technology described in paragraph (1). (e) No Additional Funds.— No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated for the purpose of carrying out this Act. (f) Sunset and Report.— (1) Sunset.— This Act shall cease

Not later than House of Representatives on an annual basis on the findings of the most recently submitted report under paragraph (1). (d) Report on Surveillance Technology.--Not later than 180 days

Finance and banking
16 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 78%

benefits lity Security Committee intends to adopt or reject the recommendation; and (ii) describing the financial implications of adopting or rejecting the recommendation, including if the benefits outweigh the costs; and (B) if the Facilit

benefits subparagraph (A); (E) Summary. a summary of the financial implications of Facility Security Committee responses to recommendations described in subparagraph (A), including if the benefits outweigh the costs; (F) Analysis. an analys

benefits and (ii) describing the financial implications of adopting or rejecting the recommendation, including if the benefits outweigh the costs; and (B) if the Facility Security Committee intends to reject the recommendation, provide the

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

49 Public Law Dec 23, 2024

Improving Federal Building Security Act of 2024 This act requires Facility Security Committees to respond to security recommendations issued by the Federal Protective Service (FPS) regarding facility security. A Facility Security Committee is a committee that (1) consists of representatives of all federal tenants in a specific nonmilitary facility, the security organization for the facility, and the owning or leasing federal tenant; and (2) is responsible for addressing facility-specific security issues and approving the implementation of security measures and practices in the facility. Not later than 90 days after the FPS issues a security recommendation to a Facility Security Committee, that committee must respond to the Department of Homeland Security (1) indicating if the committee intends to adopt or reject the recommendation; (2) describing the financial implications of adopting or rejecting the recommendation, including if the benefits outweigh the costs; and (3) providing DHS with a justification, if it intends to reject the recommendation, for accepting the risk posed by that rejection. DHS must (1) develop a procedure to monitor the recommendations and responses and take reasonable action to ensure Facility Security Committee response; and (2) report to Congress 270 days after this act's enactment and annually thereafter regarding such recommendations, responses, justifications for rejected recommendations, and risk mitigation efforts. The provisions of this act only apply to General Services Administration (GSA) facilities under FPS protection and non-GSA facilities that pay fees to the FPS for protection. This act ceases to be effective five years after enactment.

55 Passed Senate Dec 13, 2024

Improving Federal Building Security Act of 2024 This bill requires Facility Security Committees to respond to security recommendations issued by the Federal Protective Service (FPS) regarding facility security. A Facility Security Committee is a committee that (1) consists of representatives of all federal tenants in a specific nonmilitary facility, the security organization for the facility, and the owning or leasing federal tenant; and (2) is responsible for addressing facility-specific security issues and approving the implementation of security measures and practices in the facility. Not later than 90 days after the FPS issues a security recommendation to a Facility Security Committee, that committee must respond to the Department of Homeland Security (1) indicating if the committee intends to adopt or reject the recommendation; (2) describing the financial implications of adopting or rejecting the recommendation, including if the benefits outweigh the costs; and (3) providing DHS with a justification, if it intends to reject the recommendation, for accepting the risk posed by that rejection. DHS must (1) develop a procedure to monitor the recommendations and responses and take reasonable action to ensure Facility Security Committee response; and (2) report to Congress 270 days after this bill's enactment and annually thereafter regarding such recommendations, responses, justifications for rejected recommendations, and risk mitigation efforts. The provisions of this bill only apply to General Services Administration (GSA) facilities under FPS protection and non-GSA facilities that pay fees to the FPS for protection. This bill ceases to be effective five years after enactment.

00 Introduced in Senate May 21, 2024

Improving Federal Building Security Act of 2024 This bill requires Facility Security Committees to respond to security recommendations issued by the Federal Protective Service (FPS) regarding facility security. A Facility Security Committee is a committee that (1) consists of representatives of all federal tenants in a specific nonmilitary facility, the security organization for the facility, and the owning or leasing federal tenant; and (2) is responsible for addressing facility-specific security issues and approving the implementation of security measures and practices in the facility. Not later than 90 days after the FPS issues a security recommendation to a Facility Security Committee, that committee must (1) respond to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) indicating if the committee intends to adopt or reject the recommendation; and (2) provide DHS with a justification, if it intends to reject the recommendation, for accepting the risk posed by that rejection. DHS must (1) develop a procedure to monitor the recommendations and responses and take reasonable action to ensure Facility Security Committee response, and (2) report to Congress 270 days after this bill's enactment and annually thereafter regarding such recommendations and responses and this procedure.

Sponsors

Amendments

1 amendment
118/samdt/1818 Mar 23, 2024

In the nature of a substitute.

Amendment SA 1818 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.