HRES 1173 - 118Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 615) to prohibit the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture from prohibiting the use of lead ammunition or tackle on certain Federal land or water under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2925) to amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to provide for security of tenure for use of mining claims for ancillary activities, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3195) to rescind Public Land Order 7917, to reinstate mineral leases and permits in the Superior National Forest, to ensure timely review of Mine Plans of Operations, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 764) to require the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3397) to require the Director of the Bureau of Land Management to withdraw a rule of the Bureau of Land Management relating to conservation and landscape health; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6285) to ratify and approve all authorizations, permits, verifications, extensions, biological opinions, incidental take statements, and any other approvals or orders issued pursuant to Federal law necessary for the establishment and administration of the Coastal Plain oil and gas leasing program, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6090) to provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.
3 sectors · spending context
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2704-2711)
Bill Text Stats
Signal counts
Top agencies
Statutory references
House Votes
Timeline
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2704-2711)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1173.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res. 1173, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question on H.Res. 1173, and by voice vote announced that the ayes prevailed. Ms. Leger Fernandez demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2716-2718)
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 205 (Roll no. 162).
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 209 - 205 (Roll no. 163). (text: CR H2704-2705)
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 209 - 205 (Roll no. 163). (text: CR H2704-2705)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-477, by Mrs. Fischbach.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-477, by Mrs. Fischbach.
The rule provides for consideration of H.R. 615, H.R. 2925, H.R. 3195, H.R. 764, H.R. 3397, and H.R. 6090 under a closed rule, and H.R. 6285 under a structured rule. The rule provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 73.
Affected Sectors
How to read this
Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.
Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.
Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.
Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.
Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.
Secretary of Agriculture secretary of agriculture
Secretary of Agriculture secretary of agriculture
Secretary of Agriculture secretary of agriculture
h by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objec
rovals or orders issued pursuant to Federal law necessary for the establishment and administration of the Coastal Plain oil and gas leasing program, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6090) to provide
CBO Cost Estimates
Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.
How to read this
CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.
LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.
CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.
Existing agency spending context
Official USAspending.gov award records for agencies connected through bill-text agency signals. This helps show the existing agency spending landscape around the bill, not spending caused by the bill.
How to read this
USAspending records describe federal awards, grants, contracts, loans, direct payments, recipients, agencies, and dates reported through the official public spending system.
LawLinter links this context through agency names detected in bill text. That bridge is a research shortcut and should not be read as a legal or budget conclusion.
USAspending context shows official public award records for agencies connected through LawLinter bill-text agency signals. It is historical spending and award context only, not proof that this bill caused, authorized, required, or changed any award, grant, contract, payment, or program spending.
Where the local sample is concentrated
Amounts reflect the local USAspending sample linked through agency text signals, not bill-caused spending.
Award records in this context
These bars summarize the visible sampled awards below so large awards are easier to scan.
Department of Agriculture
Department of the Interior
Department of the Treasury
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CALIFORNIA
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Campaign Finance Context
Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.
How to read this
Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.
They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.
If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.
Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.
Lobbying Context
Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.
How to read this
LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.
A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.
Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.
Summary
Sponsors
