Back to search
HR 1060 - 118

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, as the "Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building".

Became Public Law No: 118-110.

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

Bill Text Stats

2
Analyzed sections
N/A
Detected dollar total
0
Tax signals
0
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%
Spending density 0.0%
Statutory Reference 1

Top agencies

N/A

Statutory references

Public Law 118-110 1

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

Nov 25, 2024

Signed by President.

Nov 25, 2024

Signed by President.

Nov 25, 2024

Became Public Law No: 118-110.

Nov 25, 2024

Became Public Law No: 118-110.

Nov 21, 2024

Presented to President.

Nov 21, 2024

Presented to President.

Nov 20, 2024

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Nov 19, 2024

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

Nov 19, 2024

Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6626)

Aug 1, 2024

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Peters without amendment. Without written report.

Aug 1, 2024

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Peters without amendment. Without written report.

Aug 1, 2024

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 455.

Jul 31, 2024

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

Feb 1, 2024

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Jan 31, 2024

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H359)

Jan 31, 2024

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: 1/29/2024 CR H264)

Jan 31, 2024

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: 1/29/2024 CR H264)

Jan 31, 2024

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Jan 29, 2024

Mr. Donalds moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

Jan 29, 2024

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H264-265)

Jan 29, 2024

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1060.

Jan 29, 2024

At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Donalds objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.

Jul 12, 2023

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jul 12, 2023

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

Feb 17, 2023

Introduced in House

Feb 17, 2023

Introduced in House

Feb 17, 2023

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Defense
1 evidence matches
Impact 84% Confidence 78%

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Standing Senate

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

49 Public Law Dec 5, 2024

This act designates the facility of the U.S. Postal Service located at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, as the Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building.

53 Passed House Feb 13, 2024

This bill designates the facility of the U.S. Postal Service located at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, as the Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building.

00 Introduced in House Feb 18, 2023

Designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, as the "Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building."

Sponsors

Aguilar, Pete
Sponsor

Aguilar, Pete

Democratic · CA-31 · A000371

Joined Feb 17, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
108 Cannon House Office Building
Lee, Barbara
Cosponsor

Lee, Barbara

Democratic · CA-13 · L000551

Joined Feb 17, 2023
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Porter, Katie
Cosponsor

Porter, Katie

Democratic · CA-45 · P000618

Joined Feb 17, 2023
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Kim, Young
Cosponsor

Kim, Young

Republican · CA-39 · K000397

Joined Feb 24, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
2439 Rayburn House Office Building
Eshoo, Anna G.
Cosponsor

Eshoo, Anna G.

Democratic · CA-18 · E000215

Joined Apr 3, 2023
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Issa, Darrell
Cosponsor

Issa, Darrell

Republican · CA-50 · I000056

Joined Apr 3, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
2108 Rayburn House Office Building

Amendments

No amendment records are currently available for this bill.
Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.