Back to search
HJRES 42 - 118

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022.

The Chair directed the Clerk to notify the Senate of the action of the House.

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

Bill Text Stats

1
Analyzed sections
N/A
Detected dollar total
0
Tax signals
0
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%
Spending density 0.0%

Top agencies

N/A

Statutory references

N/A

House Votes

Roll call 188 · Session 1 · Apr 19, 2023
On Passage
Passed
229
Yea
189
Nay
0
Present
17
NV

Timeline

Jun 13, 2023

The Chair laid before the House the veto message from the President.

Jun 13, 2023

DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House of May 26, 2023, the unfinished business is the further consideration of the veto message of the President on H.J. Res. 42. The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding. (consideration: CR H2842-2844)

Jun 13, 2023

The previous question was ordered without objection.

Jun 13, 2023

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the veto message of the President to H.J. Res. 42, the Chair put the question on will the House, on reconsideration, pass H.J. Res. 42, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding. Under the Constitution, the vote must be taken by the yeas and nays. Further proceedings were postponed until a time to be announced.

Jun 13, 2023

The Chair announced the unfinished business to be the consideration of the veto. (consideration: CR H2853)

Jun 13, 2023

Failed of passage in House over veto On passage, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 233 - 197 (Roll no. 253).

Jun 13, 2023

On passage, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 233 - 197 (Roll no. 253).

Jun 13, 2023

Motion to refer the bill and accompanying veto message to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability.

Jun 13, 2023

On motion to refer the bill and the accompanying veto message to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability. Agreed to without objection.

Jun 13, 2023

The Chair directed the Clerk to notify the Senate of the action of the House.

May 26, 2023

The Chair laid before the House the veto message from the President. (text: CR H2645)

May 26, 2023

The Chair announced that the objections of the President to H. J. Res. 42 would be spread at large upon the Journal, and the veto message would be printed as a House Document (118-45).

May 26, 2023

POSTPONED CONSIDERATION OF VETO MESSAGE - The Chair announced that further consideration of the veto message and the joint resolution, H. J. Res. 42, is postponed until the legislative day of Tuesday, June 13, 2023. Agreed to without objection.

May 25, 2023

Vetoed by President.

May 25, 2023

Vetoed by President.

May 18, 2023

Presented to President.

May 18, 2023

Presented to President.

May 17, 2023

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

May 16, 2023

Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent.

May 16, 2023

Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent.

May 16, 2023

Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S1655, S1660-1663)

May 16, 2023

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 56 - 43. Record Vote Number: 126.

May 16, 2023

Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 56 - 43. Record Vote Number: 126.

Apr 20, 2023

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Apr 19, 2023

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 298. (consideration: CR H1852-1858, H1872-1873; text: CR H1852)

Apr 19, 2023

Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 734 and H.J. Res. 42. Resolution provides for one hour of general debate on each measure and one motion to recommit allowed on H.R. 734 and if otherwise in order on H.J. Res. 42. Specified amendments are considered as read.

Apr 19, 2023

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 42.

Apr 19, 2023

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Apr 19, 2023

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.J. Res. 42, the Chair put the question on passage of the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Comer demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of passage of the resolution until a time to be announced.

Apr 19, 2023

Considered as unfinished business. H.J. Res. 42 - "Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022."

Apr 19, 2023

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 189 (Roll no. 188).

Apr 19, 2023

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 189 (Roll no. 188).

Apr 18, 2023

Rule H. Res. 298 passed House.

Apr 17, 2023

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 298 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 734 and H.J. Res. 42. Resolution provides for one hour of general debate on each measure and one motion to recommit allowed on H.R. 734 and if otherwise in order on H.J. Res. 42. Specified amendments are considered as read.

Apr 6, 2023

Reported by the Committee on Oversight and Accountability. H. Rept. 118-33.

Apr 6, 2023

Reported by the Committee on Oversight and Accountability. H. Rept. 118-33.

Apr 6, 2023

Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 12.

Mar 29, 2023

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

Mar 29, 2023

Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 17.

Mar 9, 2023

Introduced in House

Mar 9, 2023

Introduced in House

Mar 9, 2023

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Defense
1 evidence matches
Impact 84% Confidence 78%

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Standing Senate

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

55 Passed Senate May 22, 2023

This joint resolution nullifies the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022, enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia. The act sets forth a variety of measures that focus on policing in the District, including measures prohibiting the use of certain neck restraints by law enforcement officers, requiring additional procedures related to body-worn cameras, and expanding access to police disciplinary records.

53 Passed House Apr 24, 2023

This joint resolution nullifies the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022, enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia. The act sets forth a variety of measures that focus on policing, including measures prohibiting the use of certain neck restraints by law enforcement officers, requiring additional procedures related to body-worn cameras, and expanding access to police disciplinary records.

07 Reported to House Apr 11, 2023

This joint resolution nullifies the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022, enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia. The act sets forth a variety of measures that focus on policing, including measures prohibiting the use of certain neck restraints by law enforcement officers, requiring additional procedures related to body-worn cameras, and expanding access to police disciplinary records.

00 Introduced in House Mar 29, 2023

This joint resolution nullifies the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022, enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia. The act sets forth a variety of measures that focus on policing, including measures prohibiting the use of certain neck restraints by law enforcement officers, requiring additional procedures related to body-worn cameras, and expanding access to police disciplinary records.

Sponsors

Duncan, Jeff
Cosponsor

Duncan, Jeff

Republican · SC-3 · D000615

Joined Mar 9, 2023
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Grothman, Glenn
Cosponsor

Grothman, Glenn

Republican · WI-6 · G000576

Joined Mar 9, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
1211 Longworth House Office Building
Hern, Kevin
Cosponsor

Hern, Kevin

Republican · OK-1 · H001082

Joined Mar 9, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
171 Cannon House Office Building
Higgins, Clay
Cosponsor

Higgins, Clay

Republican · LA-3 · H001077

Joined Mar 9, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
572 Cannon House Office Building
Issa, Darrell
Cosponsor

Issa, Darrell

Republican · CA-50 · I000056

Joined Mar 9, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
2108 Rayburn House Office Building
Jackson, Ronny
Cosponsor

Jackson, Ronny

Republican · TX-13 · J000304

Joined Mar 9, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
125 Cannon House Office Building
Stauber, Pete
Cosponsor

Stauber, Pete

Republican · MN-8 · S001212

Joined Mar 9, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
145 Cannon House Office Building
Wilson, Joe
Cosponsor

Wilson, Joe

Republican · SC-2 · W000795

Joined Mar 9, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
1436 Longworth House Office Building
Yakym, Rudy
Cosponsor

Yakym, Rudy

Republican · IN-2 · Y000067

Joined Mar 9, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
349 Cannon House Office Building
Edwards, Chuck
Cosponsor

Edwards, Chuck

Republican · NC-11 · E000246

Joined Mar 28, 2023
Website
N/A
Office
1505 Longworth House Office Building

Amendments

No amendment records are currently available for this bill.
Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.