This resolution (1) sets forth the rule for consideration of H.R. 51 (Washington, D.C. Admission Act), H.R. 1573 (Access to Counsel Act of 2021), and H.R. 1333 (National Origin-Based Antidiscrimination for Nonimmigrants Act or the NO BAN Act); and (2) adopts H. Res. 316 (providing for expenses of certain House committees for the 117th Congress) and H. Con. Res. 30 (providing for a joint session of Congress on April 28, 2021, to receive a message from the President). The resolution also extends through May 20, 2021, the waiver of certain procedural requirements regarding journal approval, adjournment, suspension of the rules, and consideration of certain resolutions. At any time through the legislative day of April 22, 2021, the Speaker may entertain motions to suspend the rules for multiple measures that were the object of motions to suspend the rules on the legislative day of April 19, 2021, or April 20, 2021.
HRES 330 - 117Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 51) to provide for the admission of the State of Washington, D.C. into the Union; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1573) to clarify the rights of all persons who are held or detained at a port of entry or at any detention facility overseen by U.S. Customs and Border Protection or U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1333) to transfer and limit Executive Branch authority to suspend or restrict the entry of a class of aliens; and for other purposes.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Bill Text Stats
Affected Sectors
How to read this
Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.
Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.
Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.
Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.
Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.
CBO Cost Estimates
Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.
How to read this
CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.
LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.
CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.
Campaign Finance Context
Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.
How to read this
Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.
They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.
If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.
Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.
Lobbying Context
Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.
How to read this
LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.
A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.
Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.
Summary
Sponsors
![Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8]](https://www.congress.gov/img/member/r000606_200.jpg)
Timeline
Introduced in House
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 117-22, by Mr. Raskin.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 117-22, by Mr. Raskin.
The previous question on each measure is considered ordered without intervening motions except one hour of debate and a motion to recommit. H. Res. 316 and H. Con. Res. 30 are adopted.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 14.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1968-1976)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 330.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 330, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Reschenthaler demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on ordering the previous question until a time to be announced.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1977-1979)
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 206 (Roll no. 123).
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 207 (Roll no. 124).(text: CR H1968-1969)
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 207 (Roll no. 124). (text: CR H1968-1969)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.