HR 8294 - 117Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.
Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.
Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.
Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.
Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.
Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Agriculture, Rural Development, Energy and Water Development, Financial Services and General Government, Interior, Environment, Military Construction, and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act, 2
Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Agriculture, Rural Development, Energy and Water Development, Financial Services and General Government, Interior, Environment, Military Construction, and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act, 2
ure, Rural Development, Energy and Water Development, Financial Services and General Government, Interior, Environment, Military Construction, and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act, 2023 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred
Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Agriculture, Rural Development, Energy and Water Development, Financial Services and General Government, Interior, Environment, Military Construction, and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act, 2
Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.
CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.
LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.
CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.
Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.
Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.
They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.
If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.
Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.
Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.
LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.
A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.
Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6891-6901)
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1232, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the DeLauro en bloc No. 7.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the DeLauro amendment en bloc No. 7, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Granger demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1232, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Tlaib amendment No. 137.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Tlaib amendment No. 137, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Diaz- Balart demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1232, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the DeLauro en bloc No. 8.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the DeLauro en bloc amendment No. 8, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Posey demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 8294.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House adopted the amendment as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Mr. Valadao moved to recommit to the Committee on Appropriations. (text: CR H6900)
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 206 - 219 (Roll no. 382).
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 207 (Roll no. 383).
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 207 (Roll no. 383).
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 8294.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1232 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8294, H.R. 8373 and H.R. 8404. Provides for one of hour of general debate on each bill as well as one motion to recommit. Amendments are made in order. Resolution also provides for en bloc suspension authority. H. Res. 1230 is considered adopted.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1232. (consideration: CR H6741-6859; text: CR H6741-6836)
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8294, H.R. 8373 and H.R. 8404. Provides for one of hour of general debate on each bill as well as one motion to recommit. Amendments are made in order. Resolution also provides for en bloc suspension authority. H. Res. 1230 is considered adopted.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Kathy E. Manning to act as Chairwoman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 1232 and Rule XVIII.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 8294.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1232, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the DeLauro en bloc No. 1.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the DeLauro amendment en bloc No. 1, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hern demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. %kp1
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1232, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the DeLauro en bloc No. 2.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the DeLauro amendment en bloc No. 2, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Tiffany demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1232, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the DeLauro en bloc No. 3.
POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate on the DeLauro amendment en bloc No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Granger demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1232, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the DeLauro en bloc No. 4.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the DeLauro amendment en bloc No. 4, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Granger demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1232, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the DeLauro en bloc No. 5.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the DeLauro amendment en bloc No. 5, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Granger demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1232, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the DeLauro en bloc No. 6.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the DeLauro amendment en bloc No. 6, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Granger demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Ms. DeLauro moved that the committee rise.
On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 8294 as unfinished business.
Introduced in House
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 117-402, by Mr. Price (NC).
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 117-402, by Mr. Price (NC).
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 310.