Back to search
S 3191 - 115

Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018

Became Public Law No: 115-426.

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

Bill Text Stats

20
Analyzed sections
N/A
Detected dollar total
4
Tax signals
23
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 20.0%
Spending density 5.0%
Deadline 23
Statutory Reference 11
Courts 9
Privacy 5
Tax 4
Agency 2
Spending 1
Studies 1

Top agencies

Administrator of General Services shall 1
agency shall 1

Statutory references

42 U.S.C. 3631 1
44 USC 2107 1
Public Law 115-426 1
section 2107 of title 44 1
section 2112 of title 44 1
section 241 of title 18 1
section 242 of title 18 1
section 245 of title 18 1

House Votes

Roll call 482 · Session 2 · Dec 21, 2018
Passed

Timeline

Jan 8, 2019

Signed by President.

Jan 8, 2019

Signed by President.

Jan 8, 2019

Became Public Law No: 115-426.

Jan 8, 2019

Became Public Law No: 115-426.

Dec 27, 2018

Presented to President.

Dec 27, 2018

Presented to President.

Dec 21, 2018

Mr. Walker moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

Dec 21, 2018

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H10527-10531)

Dec 21, 2018

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 3191.

Dec 21, 2018

At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

Dec 21, 2018

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H10537-10538)

Dec 21, 2018

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 376 - 6 (Roll no. 482).(text: CR H10527-10531)

Dec 21, 2018

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 376 - 6 (Roll no. 482). (text: CR H10527-10531)

Dec 21, 2018

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Dec 19, 2018

Received in the House.

Dec 19, 2018

Held at the desk.

Dec 18, 2018

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Dec 17, 2018

Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S7727-7731)

Dec 17, 2018

The committee substitute withdrawn by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S7727-7731; text as reported in Senate: CR S7727-7734)

Dec 17, 2018

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

Dec 17, 2018

Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

Dec 10, 2018

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Johnson with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 115-424.

Dec 10, 2018

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Johnson with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 115-424.

Dec 10, 2018

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 727.

Sep 26, 2018

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

Jul 10, 2018

Introduced in Senate

Jul 10, 2018

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4877-4878)

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Technology and data privacy
48 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 81%

Judicial review completion of such pending cases or pursuant to privacy protection requirements in law. (3) Judicial review.-- (A) In general.--A member of the Review Board removed from office may obtain judicial review of the removal in a

Judicial review blishing any or all of the report until the completion of such pending cases or pursuant to privacy protection requirements in law. (3) Judicial review.-- (A) In general.--A member of the Review Board removed from office may

Judicial review uch pending cases or pursuant to privacy protection requirements in law. (3) Judicial review subparagraph id="id

Housing and real estate
14 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 80%

uslm-lc:I658126" (v) section 901 of the Fair Housing Act ( 42 U.S.C. 3631 ); or clause class="fontsize10" id="y

U.S.C. 3631 United States Code (relating to peonage and involuntary servitude); (v) section 901 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3631); or (vi) any other Federal law that was-- (I) in effect on or before December 31, 19

U.S.C. 3631 /text (v) section 901 of the Fair Housing Act ( 42 U.S.C. 3631 ); or /clau

Defense
20 evidence matches
Impact 97% Confidence 73%

jurisdiction ee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate shall have continuing oversight jurisdiction with respect to the official condu

jurisdiction rnment Reform of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate shall have continuing oversight jurisdiction with respect to the official conduct of the Review Board a

jurisdiction ee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate shall have continuing oversight jurisdiction with respect to the official condu

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Federal Register Context

Regulatory and agency documents that reference a law connected to this bill, including rules, proposed rules, notices, dockets, CFR references, and agency source links when available.

How to read this

Federal Register records can show how enacted laws move into agency rules, notices, comment windows, dockets, and CFR references after Congress acts.

LawLinter only treats explicit source references, such as public-law citations, as bill context at this stage. Broader topic or agency similarity should be reviewed separately.

Federal Register context shows source-attributed regulatory documents that reference a linked public or private law. It is implementation and regulatory follow-through context only; verify legal effect, dates, and official text against the Federal Register, eCFR, Regulations.gov, and GovInfo source links.

Notice

Notice of Formal Determination on Records Release

Jul 15, 2026 Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board Matched Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018

The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board received an additional 451 pages of records from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) related to two civil rights cold case incidents to which the Review Board assigned the unique identifiers 2023-001-003 and 2023-001-004. NARA proposed 372 postponements including postponements of sealed federal grand jury information in the records. On July 10, 2026, the Review Board met and approved 364 postponements and determined that 87 pages in full and 1 page in part should be publicly disclosed in the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection. The Review Board has requested that the Attorney General petition the relevant court to unseal the federal grand jury information in the records. By issuing this notice, the Review Board complies with the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 that requires the Review Board to publish in the Federal Register its determinations on the disclosure or postponement of records in the Collection no more than 14 days after the date of its decision.

Notice

Notice of Formal Determination on Records Release

Jan 6, 2025 Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board Matched Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018

The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board received 195 pages of records from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) related to seven civil rights cold case incidents to which the Review Board assigned the unique identifiers 2024-003-018, 2024-003- 023, 2024-003-035, 2024-003-038, 2024-003-051, 2024-003-067, and 2024- 003-068. NARA did not propose any postponements of disclosure. On December 20, 2024, the Review Board determined that the records should be publicly disclosed in the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection. By issuing this notice, the Review Board complies with section 7(c)(4) of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 that requires the Review Board to publish in the Federal Register its determinations on the disclosure or postponement of records in the Collection no more than 14 days after the date of its decision.

Summary

49 Public Law Apr 16, 2019

Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 This bill requires the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to: (1) establish a collection of civil rights cold case records; (2) prepare and publish the subject guidebook and index to the collection; and (3) establish criteria for transmitting copies of civil rights cold case records to NARA, to include required metadata. All civil rights cold case records transmitted to NARA for disclosure to the public shall be included in the collection, available to the public for inspection and copying, and prioritized for digitization by NARA. The bill requires redacted records or records for which public disclosure is postponed to be reviewed annually. The bill enumerates grounds for which disclosure of records may be postponed, including causing damage to national security, invading personal privacy, or interfering with ongoing law enforcement proceedings. The bill establishes the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board as an independent agency of impartial private citizens. The board shall consider and render decisions on determinations to seek postponement of disclosure of civil rights cold case records. With the exception of certain administrative records, records of the review board shall not be destroyed. The review board may request the Department of Justice to petition any court in the United States or abroad to release information relevant to civil rights cold cases held under seal of court. A similar request may be made to a court in the United States for release of information held under an injunction of grand-jury secrecy.

00 Introduced in Senate Dec 28, 2018

Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 This bill requires the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to: (1) commence establishing a collection of civil rights cold case records, (2) commence preparing and publishing the subject guidebook and index to the collection, and (3) establish criteria for transmitting copies of civil rights cold case records to NARA, to include required metadata. All civil rights cold case records transmitted to NARA for disclosure to the public shall be included in the collection, available to the public for inspection and copying by 60 days after the record's transmission to NARA, and prioritized for digitization by NARA. The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board is established as an independent agency of impartial private citizens. The records of the review board shall not be destroyed, with an exception.

Sponsors

Amendments

No amendment records are currently available for this bill.
Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.