Back to search

Bill Text Stats

71
Analyzed sections
$6.1B
Detected dollar total
1
Tax signals
28
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 1.4%
Spending density 31.0%
Statutory Reference 66
Deadline 28
Agency 27
Amendments 24
Spending 22
Studies 13
Rulemaking 8
Privacy 4
Courts 3
Enforcement 1
Tax 1

Top agencies

Commission shall 27

Statutory references

15 U.S.C. 77d 5
15 U.S.C. 78c 5
15 USC 77d 4
15 U.S.C. 77r 4
15 USC 78l 4
15 USC 78c 3
12 U.S.C. 1841 2
15 U.S.C. 77b 2

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

Apr 5, 2012

Signed by President.

Apr 5, 2012

Signed by President.

Apr 5, 2012

Became Public Law No: 112-106.

Apr 5, 2012

Became Public Law No: 112-106.

Mar 27, 2012

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Mar 27, 2012

Mr. Bachus moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H1586-1593, H1597-1598)

Mar 27, 2012

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the Senate amendment to H.R. 3606.

Mar 27, 2012

At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

Mar 27, 2012

Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 380 - 41 (Roll no. 132).(text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H1586-1588)

Mar 27, 2012

On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 380 - 41 (Roll no. 132). (text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H1586-1588)

Mar 27, 2012

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Mar 27, 2012

Presented to President.

Mar 27, 2012

Presented to President.

Mar 22, 2012

Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1963-1977)

Mar 22, 2012

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 73 - 26. Record Vote Number: 55.

Mar 22, 2012

Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 73 - 26. Record Vote Number: 55.

Mar 21, 2012

Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1884-1919)

Mar 21, 2012

Cloture on the bill invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 76 - 22. Record Vote Number: 53. (consideration: CR S1884; text: CR S1884)

Mar 21, 2012

Motion by Senator Reid to commit to Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs with instructions that the Committee report back forthwith with amendment SA 1838 fell when cloture was invoked on the bill in Senate.

Mar 20, 2012

Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1824-1831, S1840-1842)

Mar 19, 2012

Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1776-1784)

Mar 15, 2012

Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S1693-1696, S1714, S1714-1729)

Mar 15, 2012

Motion by Senator Reid to commit to Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs with instructions that the Committee report back forthwith with amendment SA 1838 made in Senate. (consideration: CR S1694; text: CR S1694)

Mar 15, 2012

Cloture motion on the bill presented in Senate. (consideration: CR S1694; text: CR S1694)

Mar 13, 2012

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 334.

Mar 12, 2012

Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.

Mar 8, 2012

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1277-1285)

Mar 8, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McHenry amendment No. 11.

Mar 8, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Miller (NC) amendment No. 12.

Mar 8, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Schweikert amendment No. 13.

Mar 8, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Capuano amendment No. 14.

Mar 8, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Peters (MI) amendment No. 15.

Mar 8, 2012

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Peters(MI) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Peters(MI) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Mar 8, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Capps amendment No. 16.

Mar 8, 2012

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Capps amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Capps demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Mar 8, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Loebsack amendment No. 17.

Mar 8, 2012

Mr. Hensarling moved that the committee rise.

Mar 8, 2012

On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.

Mar 8, 2012

Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 3606 as unfinished business.

Mar 8, 2012

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1285-1289)

Mar 8, 2012

The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.

Mar 8, 2012

UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.

Mar 8, 2012

The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3606.

Mar 8, 2012

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H1287)

Mar 8, 2012

The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR 3/7/2012 H1245-1249)

Mar 8, 2012

Ms. Eshoo moved to recommit with instructions to Financial Services. (consideration: CR H1287-1288; text: CR H1287)

Mar 8, 2012

DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Eshoo motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require that the bill be reported back to the House with an amendment providing for public disclosures to the Federal Election Commission of any political expenditures or contributions made during a fiscal year.

Mar 8, 2012

The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H1288)

Mar 8, 2012

On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 170 - 244 (Roll no. 109). (consideration: CR H1288)

Mar 8, 2012

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 390 - 23 (Roll no. 110).

Mar 8, 2012

On passage Passed by recorded vote: 390 - 23 (Roll no. 110).

Mar 8, 2012

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Mar 8, 2012

The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 3606.

Mar 8, 2012

Received in the Senate.

Mar 7, 2012

Rule H. Res. 572 passed House.

Mar 7, 2012

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 572. (consideration: CR H1236)

Mar 7, 2012

Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3606 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. The resolution provides that an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of text of Rules Committee Print 112-17 shall be considered as adopted. The resolution waives all points of order against the amendments printed in the report.

Mar 7, 2012

The Speaker designated the Honorable Robert J. Dold to act as Chairman of the Committee.

Mar 7, 2012

House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 572 and Rule XVIII.

Mar 7, 2012

GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 3606.

Mar 7, 2012

WORDS TAKEN DOWN - During the course of debate, exception was taken to certain words used and a demand was made to have words taken down. Subsequently, the words were reported to the Committee of the Whole and the Chair announced that the Committee would rise.

Mar 7, 2012

RULING OF THE CHAIR - After review, the Chair ruled that the remarks constituted a personality directed towards an indentifiable Member and announced that, without objection, said remarks would be stricken from the record. Subsequently, the Chair announced that the Committee of the Whole would resume its sitting.

Mar 7, 2012

Considered as unfinished business.

Mar 7, 2012

The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.

Mar 7, 2012

GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole resumed general debate on H.R. 3606.

Mar 7, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fincher amendment No. 1.

Mar 7, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McIntyre amendment No. 2.

Mar 7, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Himes amendment No. 3.

Mar 7, 2012

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Himes amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Himes demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Mar 7, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 4.

Mar 7, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ellison amendment No. 5.

Mar 7, 2012

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Ellison amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Ellison demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Mar 7, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Waters amendment No. 6.

Mar 7, 2012

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Waters amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Waters demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Mar 7, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 7.

Mar 7, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 8.

Mar 7, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Connolly (VA) amendment No. 9.

Mar 7, 2012

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Connolly (VA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Connolly (VA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Mar 7, 2012

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 572, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McCarthy (CA) amendment No. 10.

Mar 7, 2012

UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.

Mar 7, 2012

Mr. Hensarling moved that the Committee rise.

Mar 7, 2012

On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.

Mar 7, 2012

Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 3606 as unfinished business.

Mar 6, 2012

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 112-482.

Mar 6, 2012

Supplemental report filed by the Committee on Financial Services, H. Rept. 112-406, Part II.

Mar 6, 2012

Supplemental report filed by the Committee on Financial Services, H. Rept. 112-406, Part II.

Mar 6, 2012

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 572 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3606 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. The resolution provides that an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of text of Rules Committee Print 112-17 shall be considered as adopted. The resolution waives all points of order against the amendments printed in the report.

Mar 1, 2012

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 112-406.

Mar 1, 2012

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 112-406.

Mar 1, 2012

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 281.

Feb 16, 2012

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

Feb 16, 2012

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 54 - 1.

Feb 15, 2012

Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises Discharged.

Jan 12, 2012

Referred to the Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises.

Dec 15, 2011

Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises Prior to Referral.

Dec 8, 2011

Introduced in House

Dec 8, 2011

Introduced in House

Dec 8, 2011

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E2210-2211)

Dec 8, 2011

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Finance and banking
1,341 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 90%

Finance and Financial Sector

Finance and Financial Sector

Securities

Technology and data privacy
19 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 81%

Commission shall rth in section 4(6)(B); ``(9) take such steps to protect the privacy of information collected from investors as the Commission shall, by rule, determine appropriate; [[Page 126 STAT. 317]] ``(10)

all (9) take such steps to protect the privacy of information collected from investors as the Commission shall, by rule, determine appropriate; /paragr

Commission shall exceed the investment limits set forth in section 4(6)(B); ``(9) take such steps to protect the privacy of information collected from investors as the Commission shall, by rule, determine appropriate; ``(10) not compensate

Labor and employment
18 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 78%

had total annual gross revenues of less than $1,000,000,000 (as such amount is indexed for inflation every 5 years by the Commission to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor

g which it had total annual gross revenues of $1,000,000,000 (as such amount is indexed for inflation every 5 years by the Commission to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor

had total annual gross revenues of less than $1,000,000,000 (as such amount is indexed for inflation every 5 years by the Commission to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor

Telecom and broadband
15 evidence matches
Impact 96% Confidence 74%

U.S.C. 78o-6 es information reasonably sufficient upon which to base an investment decision.''. (b) Securities Analyst Communications.--Section 15D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o-6) is amended-- (1) by redesignating

U.S.C. 77e rities association whose functional role is other than as a securities analyst.''. (c) Expanding Permissible Communications.--Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77e) is amended-- (1) by redesignating subsection (d

with the Commission, subject to the requirement of subsection (b)(2).''. (d) Post Offering Communications.-- Neither the Commission nor any national securities association registered under section 15A of the Sec

Education
5 evidence matches
Impact 94% Confidence 80%

all es Exchange Act of 1934); ``(3) provide such disclosures, including disclosures related to risks and other investor education materials, as the Commission shall, by rule, determine appropriate; ``(4) ensure that each investor-- ``(A) re

73314e3959ce" (3) provide such disclosures, including disclosures related to risks and other investor education materials, as the Commission shall, by rule, determine appropriate; paragraph id="IDd7bd6a

all es Exchange Act of 1934); ``(3) provide such disclosures, including disclosures related to risks and other investor education materials, as the Commission shall, by rule, determine appropriate; ``(4) ensure that each investor-- ``(A) re

State and local government
8 evidence matches
Impact 91% Confidence 73%

tation. In carrying out this section, the Commission shall consult with any securities commission (or any agency or office performing like functions) of the States, any territory of the United States, and the District of Columbia, which s

y this title. In carrying out this section, the Commission shall consult with any securities commission (or any agency or office performing like functions) of the States, any territory of the United States, and the District of Columbia, whi

is title. In carrying out this section, the Commission shall consult with any securities commission (or any agency or office performing like functions) of the States, any territory of the United States, and the District of Columbia, which s

Small business
1 evidence matches
Impact 88% Confidence 82%

15 USC 78d SEC. 701. OUTREACH BY THE COMMISSION. The Securities and Exchange Commission shall provide online information and conduc

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Federal Register Context

Regulatory and agency documents that reference a law connected to this bill, including rules, proposed rules, notices, dockets, CFR references, and agency source links when available.

How to read this

Federal Register records can show how enacted laws move into agency rules, notices, comment windows, dockets, and CFR references after Congress acts.

LawLinter only treats explicit source references, such as public-law citations, as bill context at this stage. Broader topic or agency similarity should be reviewed separately.

Federal Register context shows source-attributed regulatory documents that reference a linked public or private law. It is implementation and regulatory follow-through context only; verify legal effect, dates, and official text against the Federal Register, eCFR, Regulations.gov, and GovInfo source links.

Proposed Rule

Enhancement of Emerging Growth Company Accommodations and Simplification of Filer Status for Reporting Companies

May 21, 2026 Securities and Exchange Commission Matched Jumpstart Our Business Startups

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") proposes amendments to streamline filer statuses for Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") reporting companies into two primary categories: large accelerated filers and non-accelerated filers. The Commission further proposes to raise the threshold and seasoning requirements for large accelerated filer status and extend certain existing accommodations and scaled disclosures, including those for smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies, to all non-accelerated filers, while continuing to require compliance with non-scaled disclosure from large accelerated filers. The Commission also proposes to extend the deadlines to file periodic reports for the smallest non-accelerated filers, as measured by total assets. Finally, the Commission also proposes to update the rules that define which issuers are considered small entities for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act ("RFA").

Summary

49 Public Law Jun 19, 2012

Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act - Title I: Reopening American Capital Markets to Emerging Growth Companies - (Sec. 101) Amends the Securities Act of 1933 (SA) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA) to define "emerging growth company" as an issuer that had total annual gross revenues of less than $1 billion during its most recently completed fiscal year. Disqualifies from treatment as an emerging growth company any issuer whose first sale of its common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement occurred on or before December 8, 2011. (Sec. 102) Amends SEA and the Investor Protection and Securities Reform Act of 2010 (title IX of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act [Dodd-Frank]) to exempt emerging growth companies from the requirement for separate shareholder approval of executive compensation, including golden parachute compensation. Requires any emerging growth company that ceases to be one to comply with procedures for soliciting a separate shareholder approval of executive compensation. Amends SA to state that an emerging growth company need not present more than two years of audited financial statements in order for its registration statement, with respect to an initial public offering of its common equity securities, to be effective. Amends both SA and SEA to state that, in any other registration statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), an emerging growth company need not present certain selected financial data for any period before the earliest audited period presented in connection with its initial public offering. Declares that an emerging growth company may not be required to comply with any new or revised financial accounting standard until a company that is not an issuer is required to comply with it, if the standard applies to companies that are not issuers. An emerging growth company may comply, however, with specified executive compensation disclosure requirements by disclosing the same information as any issuer with a market value of outstanding voting and nonvoting common equity held by non-affiliates of less than $75 million. (Sec. 103) Amends the the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to exempt a registered public accounting firm that prepares or issues a report on its audit of an emerging growth company from the requirement that it attest to, and report on, any assessment of internal controls the company's management has made. (Sec. 104) Modifies the application to emerging growth companies of any auditing or other professional standards the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board may establish that were proposed by one or more professional groups of accountants. Exempts an emerging growth company from any such rules requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor's report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the issuer's financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis). Applies this exemption also with respect to any additional rules adopted by the Board after enactment of this Act, unless the SEC decides otherwise and determines that their application to emerging growth companies is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, after considering the protection of investors and whether the action will promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation. (Sec. 105) Amends SA to deem not to constitute an offer for sale or offer to sell a security, for the purposes of prospectus and specified registration requirements, a broker's or dealer's publication or distribution of a written, electronic, or oral research report about an emerging growth company that is the subject of a proposed public offering of its common equity securities pursuant to a registration statement the issuer proposes to file, or has filed, or that is effective, even if the broker or dealer is participating or will participate in the registered offering of the issuer's securities. Prohibits the SEC and any registered national securities association from adopting or maintaining any conflict-of-interest rule or regulation in connection with an initial public offering of the common equity of an emerging growth company that restricts: (1) which associated persons (based on functional role) of a broker, dealer, or member of a national securities association may arrange for communications between a securities analyst and a potential investor; or (2) a securities analyst from participating in any communications with the management of an emerging growth company that is also attended by any other associated person of a broker, dealer, or member of a national securities association whose functional role is other than as a securities analyst. Authorizes an emerging growth company, or any person authorized to act on behalf of one, to engage in oral or written communications with potential investors that are qualified institutional buyers or institutions that are accredited investors to determine whether such investors might have an interest in a contemplated securities offering, either before or after the filing of a registration statement with the SEC. Prohibits the SEC and any registered national securities association from adopting or maintaining any rule or regulation prohibiting any broker, dealer, or member of a national securities association from publishing or distributing any research report, or making a public appearance, with respect to the securities of an emerging growth company. (Sec. 106) Amends SA to authorize an emerging growth company, before its initial public offering date, to submit to the SEC a draft registration statement for confidential nonpublic review by SEC staff before the public filing, provided that the initial confidential submission and all amendments to it are publicly filed with the SEC within 21 days before the issuer conducts a "road show." Declares that the SEC, however, shall not be compelled to disclose such information. (A "road show" is an offer that contains a presentation regarding an offering by one or more members of the issuer's management and includes discussion of the issuer, its management, and/or the securities being offered.) Directs the SEC to study the transition to trading and quoting securities in one penny increments ("decimalization"), and the impact it has had upon: (1) the number of initial public offerings since its implementation, and (2) liquidity for small and middle capitalization company securities and whether there is sufficient economic incentive to support trading operations in these securities in penny increments. Authorizes the SEC, if it determines that securities of emerging growth companies should be quoted and traded using a minimum increment of more than $0.01, to designate a minimum increment for such securities of between $0.01 and $0.10 for use in all quoting and trading of securities in any exchange or other execution venue. (Sec. 107) Authorizes an emerging growth company to choose to forgo an exemption granted under this Act and instead comply with the requirements that apply to an issuer that is not an emerging growth company. Prescribes a special extension of time rule for an emerging growth company that chooses to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards under this Act to the same extent that a non-emerging growth company is required to comply with them. Requires the emerging growth company that makes such a choice to: (1) notify the SEC of its choice at the time it is first required to file its registration statement or periodic or other reports, and (2) continue to comply with all such standards to the same extent that a non-emerging growth company is required to do so for as long as it remains an emerging growth company. Prohibits such a company from choosing to comply in this manner with some standards but not others. (Sec. 108) Instructs the SEC to analyze how the current requirements of Regulation S-K (on the non-financial statement portions of registration statements) can be updated to modernize and simplify the registration process and reduce associated costs and other burdens for emerging growth companies. Title II: Access to Capital for Job Creators - (Sec. 201) Directs the SEC to revise its rules governing an exemption from public offering (especially broker or dealer registration) requirements for limited offers and sales of securities without regard to the dollar amount of the offering (Regulation D), so as to provide that a specified prohibition against general solicitation or general advertising does not apply to offers and sales of securities made pursuant to Regulation D if all purchasers of the securities are accredited investors. Requires such rules to require the issuer to take reasonable steps to verify that purchasers of the securities are accredited investors, using methods determined by the SEC. Requires the SEC to provide that securities sold under this revised exemption may be offered to persons other than qualified institutional buyers, including by means of general solicitation or general advertising, provided that securities are sold only to persons that the seller and any person acting on the seller's behalf reasonably believe is a qualified institutional buyer. Deems offers and sales exempt from registration requirements under Regulation D not to be public offerings under federal securities laws as a result of general advertising or general solicitation. Exempts any person meeting certain criteria from broker or dealer registration requirements, with respect to securities offered and sold in compliance with Regulation D, if that person would be subject to such requirements solely because: (1) that person maintains a platform or mechanism that permits the offer, sale, purchase, or negotiation of or with respect to securities, or permits general solicitations, general advertisements, or similar or related activities by their issuers, whether online, in person, or through any other means; (2) that person or any associated person co-invests in such securities; or (3) that person or any associated person provides certain ancillary services with respect to such securities. Allows such an exemption if that person and each associated person: (1) receives no compensation in connection with the purchase or sale of such security, (2) does not have possession of customer funds or securities in connection with such a purchase or sale, and (3) is not subject to a statutory disqualification. Title III: Crowdfunding - Capital Raising Online While Deterring Fraud and Unethical Non-Disclosure Act of 2012 or CROWDFUND Act - (Sec. 302) Amends the SA to prescribe conditions under which transactions of $1 million or less involving the offer or sale of securities by an issuer through a broker or funding portal are exempt from certain registration requirements and prohibitions relating to interstate commerce and the mails (crowdfunding exemption). (Crowdfunding is a method of capital formation by which groups of people pool money, typically composed of very small individual contributions, and often via Internet platforms, to invest in a company or otherwise support an effort by others to accomplish a specific goal.) Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA) to define "funding portal" as any person acting as an intermediary in a transaction involving the offer or sale of securities for the account of others, solely pursuant to the crowdfunding exemption under this Act, that does not: (1) offer investment advice or recommendations; (2) solicit purchases, sales, or offers to buy the securities offered or displayed on its website or portal; (3) compensate employees, agents, or other persons for such solicitation or based on the sale of securities displayed or references on its website or portal; (4) hold, manage, possess, or otherwise handle investor funds or securities; or (5) engage in other activities determined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Amends the SA to set forth qualification requirements for such crowdfunding exemption, including those for intermediaries and issuers. Sets forth restrictions on sales of such exempt securities. (Sec. 303) Amends the SEA to authorize the SEC to exempt crowdfunding investors from certain shareholder caps under the Securities Act of 1933. (Sec. 304) Requires the SEC to exempt funding portals from certain registration requirements, provided that they remain subject to examination by the SEC and a national securities association. (Sec. 305) Prohibits a state or its political subdivision from enforcing any law or administrative action against a registered funding portal with respect to its business as such. Exempts from such prohibition the examination and enforcement of any law or administrative action of a state in which the principal place of business of a registered funding portal is located, if the law or administrative action is not in addition to or different from SEC requirements for registered funding portals. Title IV: Small Company Capital Formation - (Sec. 401) Amends the SA to direct the SEC to exempt from its regulation a class of securities for which the aggregate offering amount of all securities sold within the prior 12-month period in reliance upon such exemption does not exceed $50 million. Restricts any such exemption to equity securities, debt securities, and debt securities convertible or exchangeable to equity interests, including any guarantees of such securities. Subjects to civil liability certain violations arising from offering or selling securities by use of prospectuses and communications. Authorizes the SEC to: (1) require an issuer of such exempted class of securities to make periodic disclosures available to investors regarding the issuer, its business operations, financial condition, corporate governance principles, and use of investor funds; (2) require the issuer to file electronically with the SEC and distribute to prospective investors an offering statement which includes this information; (3) provide for the suspension and termination of this disclosure requirement with respect to that issuer; and (4) prescribe exemption disqualification requirements, substantially similar to regulations adopted in accordance with Dodd-Frank, under which the exemption shall not be available to the issuer and related persons, including predecessors, affiliates, officers, directors, and underwriters. Requires the SEC to: (1) review and increase biennially such offering amount limitation, as appropriate; and (2) report to certain congressional committees its reasons for not increasing the amount if it determines not to do so. Exempts from state regulation the securities covered and required to be exempted from SEC regulation by this Act. (Sec. 402) Directs the Comptroller General to study the impact of state laws regulating securities offerings (Blue Sky laws) on offerings made under Regulation A (which specifies the terms and conditions of exemption from the registration requirements of the SA). Title V: Private Company Flexibility and Growth - (Sec. 501) Amends SEA to increase from $1 million to $10 million the shareholder registration threshold for an issuer of securities who either has a class of equity securities held of record by 2,000 persons or by 500 persons who are not accredited investors (currently, a class of non-exempted equity security held of record by 750 or more persons). (Sec. 502) Excludes from the definition "held of record" for purposes of determining mandatory registration, any securities received pursuant to an employee compensation plan in transactions exempted from certain SA registration requirements. (Sec. 503) Directs the SEC to: (1) revise the definition of "held of record" to implement this title, (2) adopt safe harbor provisions to help issuers determine whether holders of their securities received them pursuant to such an employee compensation plan, and (3) submit recommendations to Congress if it determines that new enforcement tools are needed to enforce certain anti-evasion provisions. Title VI: Capital Expansion - (Sec. 601) Amends SEA regarding registration of securities to modify the registration threshold for an issuer that is either a bank or a bank holding company as well as for an issuer that is neither a bank nor a bank holding company. Raises from $1 million to $10 million the threshold for total assets of an issuer that requires registration of a certain class of equity security held of record by 2,000 or more persons. Requires termination of a security registration in the case of a bank or a bank holding company if the number of holders of record of the class of security is reduced to less than 1,200. (Sec. 602) Directs the SEC to issue final regulations to implement this Act. Title VII: Outreach on Changes to the Law - (Sec. 701) Directs the SEC to provide online information and conduct outreach to inform small and medium sized businesses, women owned businesses, veteran owned businesses, and minority owned businesses of the changes made by this Act.

17 Reported to House with amendment(s) Mar 30, 2012

Reopening American Capital Markets to Emerging Growth Companies Act of 2012 - (Sec. 2) Amends the Securities Act of 1933 (SA) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA) to define "emerging growth company" as an issuer that had total annual gross revenues of less than $1 billion during its most recently completed fiscal year. Disqualifies from treatment as an emerging growth company any issuer whose first sale of its common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement occurred on or before December 8, 2011. (Sec. 3) Amends SEA and the Investor Protection and Securities Reform Act of 2010 (title IX of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) to exempt emerging growth companies from the requirement for separate shareholder approval of executive compensation, including golden parachute compensation. Requires any emerging growth company that ceases to be one to comply with procedures for soliciting a separate shareholder approval of executive compensation. Amends SA to state that an emerging growth company need not present more than two years of audited financial statements in order for its registration statement, with respect to an initial public offering of its common equity securities, to be effective. Amends both SA and SEA to state that, in any other registration statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), an emerging growth company need not present certain selected financial data for any period before the earliest audited period presented in connection with its initial public offering. Declares that an emerging growth company may not be required to comply with any new or revised financial accounting standard until a company that is not an issuer is required to comply with it, if the standard applies to companies that are not issuers. An emerging growth company may comply, however, with specified executive compensation disclosure requirements by disclosing the same information as any issuer with a market value of outstanding voting and nonvoting common equity held by non-affiliates of less than $75 million. (Sec. 4) Amends the the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to exempt a registered public accounting firm that prepares or issues a report on its audit of an emerging growth company from the requirement that it attest to, and report on, any assessment of internal controls the company's management has made. (Sec. 5) Modifies the application to emerging growth companies of any auditing or other professional standards the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board may establish that were proposed by one or more professional groups of accountants. Exempts an emerging growth company from any such rules requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor's report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the issuer's financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis). Applies this exemption also with respect to any additional rules adopted by the Board after enactment of this Act, unless the SEC decides otherwise and determines that their application to emerging growth companies is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, after considering the protection of investors and whether the action will promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation. (Sec. 6) Amends SA to deem not to constitute an offer for sale or offer to sell a security, for the purposes of prospectus and specified registration requirements, a broker's or dealer's publication or distribution of a written, electronic, or oral research report about an emerging growth company that is the subject of a proposed public offering of its common equity securities pursuant to a registration statement the issuer proposes to file, or has filed, or that is effective, even if the broker or dealer is participating or will participate in the registered offering of the issuer's securities. Prohibits the SEC and any registered national securities association from adopting or maintaining any conflict-of-interest rule or regulation in connection with an initial public offering of the common equity of an emerging growth company that restricts: (1) which associated persons (based on functional role) of a broker, dealer, or member of a national securities association may arrange for communications between a securities analyst and a potential investor; or (2) a securities analyst from participating in any communications with the management of an emerging growth company that is also attended by any other associated person of a broker, dealer, or member of a national securities association whose functional role is other than as a securities analyst. Authorizes an emerging growth company, or any person authorized to act on behalf of one, to engage in oral or written communications with potential investors that are qualified institutional buyers or institutions that are accredited investors to determine whether such investors might have an interest in a contemplated securities offering, either before or after the filing of a registration statement with the SEC. Prohibits the SEC and any registered national securities association from adopting or maintaining any rule or regulation prohibiting any broker, dealer, or member of a national securities association from publishing or distributing any research report, or making a public appearance, with respect to the securities of an emerging growth company. (Sec. 7) Amends SA to authorize an emerging growth company, before its initial public offering date, to submit to the SEC a draft registration statement for confidential nonpublic review by SEC staff before the public filing, provided that the initial confidential submission and all amendments to it are publicly filed with the SEC within 21 days before the issuer conducts a "road show." Declares that the SEC, however, shall not be compelled to disclose such information. (A "road show" is an offer that contains a presentation regarding an offering by one or more members of the issuer's management and includes discussion of the issuer, its management, and/or the securities being offered.) Directs the SEC to study the transition to trading and quoting securities in one penny increments ("decimalization"), and the impact it has had upon: (1) the number of initial public offerings since its implementation, and (2) liquidity for small and middle capitalization company securities and whether there is sufficient economic incentive to support trading operations in these securities in penny increments. Authorizes the SEC, if it determines that securities of emerging growth companies should be quoted and traded using a minimum increment of more than $0.01, to designate a minimum increment for such securities of between $0.01 and $0.10 for use in all quoting and trading of securities in any exchange or other execution venue. (Sec. 8) Authorizes an emerging growth company to choose to forgo an exemption granted under this Act and instead comply with the requirements that apply to an issuer that is not an emerging growth company. Prescribes a special extension of time rule for an emerging growth company that chooses to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards under this Act to the same extent that a non-emerging growth company is required to comply with them. Requires the emerging growth company that makes such a choice to: (1) notify the SEC of its choice at the time it is first required to file its registration statement or periodic or other reports, and (2) continue to comply with all such standards to the same extent that a non-emerging growth company is required to do so for as long as it remains an emerging growth company. Prohibits such a company from choosing to comply in this manner with some standards but not others. (Sec. 9) Instructs the SEC to analyze how the current requirements of Regulation S-K (on the non-financial statement portions of registration statements) can be updated to modernize and simplify the registration process and reduce associated costs and other burdens for emerging growth companies.

00 Introduced in House Mar 2, 2012

Reopening American Capital Markets to Emerging Growth Companies Act of 2011 - Amends the Securities Act of 1933 (SA) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA) to define "emerging growth company" as an issuer that had total annual gross revenues of less than $1 billion during its most recently completed fiscal year. Amends SEA and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 to exempt emerging growth companies from the requirement for separate shareholder approval of executive compensation, including golden parachute compensation. Amends SA to state that an emerging growth company need not present more than two years of audited financial statements in order for its registration statement, with respect to an initial public offering of its common equity securities, to be effective. Amends both SA and SEA to state that, in any other registration statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), an emerging growth company need not present financial data for any period before the earliest audited period presented in connection with its initial public offering. Authorizes the SEC to recognize, as generally accepted accounting principles, those established by a standard setting body that, in addition to other criteria, has not established any accounting principles that would require an emerging growth company to comply with any new or revised financial accounting standard as of an effective date earlier than the one applying to a company that is not an issuer. Amends the the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to exempt a registered public accounting firm that prepares or issues a report on its audit of an emerging growth company from the requirement that it attest to, and report on, any assessment of internal controls the company's management has made. Modifies the application to emerging growth companies of any auditing or other professional standards the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board may establish that were proposed by one or more professional groups of accountants. Exempts an emerging growth company from any such rules requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor's report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the issuer's financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis). Applies this exemption also with respect to any additional rules adopted by the Board after enactment of this Act, unless the SEC decides otherwise and determines that their application to emerging growth companies is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, after considering the protection of investors and whether the action will promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation. Amends SA to deem not to constitute an offer for sale or offer to sell a security, for the purposes of prospectus and specified registration requirements, a broker's or dealer's publication or distribution of a written, electronic, or oral research report about an emerging growth company that is the subject of a proposed public offering of its common equity securities pursuant to a registration statement the issuer proposes to file, or has filed, or that is effective, even if the broker or dealer is participating or will participate in the registered offering of the issuer's securities. Prohibits the SEC and any registered national securities association from adopting or maintaining any conflict-of-interest rule or regulation in connection with an initial public offering of the common equity of an emerging growth company that restricts: (1) which associated persons (based on functional role) of a broker, dealer, or member of a national securities association may arrange for communications between a securities analyst and a potential investor; or (2) a securities analyst from participating in any communications with the management of an emerging growth company that is also attended by any other associated person of a broker, dealer, or member of a national securities association whose functional role is other than as a securities analyst. Authorizes an emerging growth company, or any person authorized to act on behalf of one, to engage in oral or written communications with potential investors that are qualified institutional buyers or institutions that are accredited investors to determine whether such investors might have an interest in a contemplated securities offering, either before or after the filing of a registration statement with the SEC. Prohibits the SEC and any registered national securities association from adopting or maintaining any rule or regulation prohibiting any broker, dealer, or member of a national securities association from publishing or distributing any research report, or making a public appearance, with respect to the securities of an emerging growth company. Amends SA to authorize an emerging growth company, before its initial public offering date, to submit to the SEC a draft registration statement for confidential nonpublic review by SEC staff before the public filing, provided that the initial confidential submission and all amendments to it are publicly filed with the SEC within 21 days before the issuer conducts a "road show." Declares that the SEC, however, shall not be compelled to disclose such information. (A "road show" is an offer that contains a presentation regarding an offering by one or more members of the issuer's management and includes discussion of the issuer, its management, and/or the securities being offered.)

Sponsors

Fincher, Stephen Lee
Sponsor

Fincher, Stephen Lee

Republican · TN-8 · F000458

Joined Dec 8, 2011
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Carney, John C., Jr.
Cosponsor

Carney, John C., Jr.

Democratic · DE-0 · C001083

Joined Dec 8, 2011
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Crowley, Joseph
Cosponsor

Crowley, Joseph

Democratic · NY-14 · C001038

Joined Dec 8, 2011
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Eshoo, Anna G.
Cosponsor

Eshoo, Anna G.

Democratic · CA-18 · E000215

Joined Dec 8, 2011
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Garrett, Scott
Cosponsor

Garrett, Scott

Republican · NJ-5 · G000548

Joined Dec 8, 2011
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Hensarling, Jeb
Cosponsor

Hensarling, Jeb

Republican · TX-5 · H001036

Joined Dec 8, 2011
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Huizenga, Bill
Cosponsor

Huizenga, Bill

Republican · MI-4 · H001058

Joined Dec 8, 2011
Website
N/A
Office
2232 Rayburn House Office Building
Kind, Ron
Cosponsor

Kind, Ron

Democratic · WI-3 · K000188

Joined Dec 8, 2011
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
McHenry, Patrick T.
Cosponsor

McHenry, Patrick T.

Republican · NC-10 · M001156

Joined Dec 8, 2011
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Perlmutter, Ed
Cosponsor

Perlmutter, Ed

Democratic · CO-7 · P000593

Joined Dec 8, 2011
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Polis, Jared
Cosponsor

Polis, Jared

Democratic · CO-2 · P000598

Joined Dec 8, 2011
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Royce, Edward R.
Cosponsor

Royce, Edward R.

Republican · CA-39 · R000487

Joined Dec 15, 2011
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Moore, Gwen
Cosponsor

Moore, Gwen

Democratic · WI-4 · M001160

Joined Dec 16, 2011
Website
N/A
Office
2252 Rayburn House Office Building
Meehan, Patrick
Cosponsor

Meehan, Patrick

Republican · PA-7 · M001181

Joined Jan 23, 2012
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
King, Peter T.
Cosponsor

King, Peter T.

Republican · NY-2 · K000210

Joined Jan 31, 2012
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Sessions, Pete
Cosponsor

Sessions, Pete

Republican · TX-17 · S000250

Joined Jan 31, 2012
Website
N/A
Office
2204 Rayburn House Office Building
Smith, Adam
Cosponsor

Smith, Adam

Democratic · WA-9 · S000510

Joined Feb 2, 2012
Website
N/A
Office
2264 Rayburn House Office Building
Hurt, Robert
Cosponsor

Hurt, Robert

Republican · VA-5 · H001060

Joined Feb 6, 2012
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Womack, Steve
Cosponsor

Womack, Steve

Republican · AR-3 · W000809

Joined Feb 6, 2012
Website
N/A
Office
2412 Rayburn House Office Building
Schock, Aaron
Cosponsor

Schock, Aaron

Republican · IL-18 · S001179

Joined Feb 7, 2012
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Luetkemeyer, Blaine
Cosponsor

Luetkemeyer, Blaine

Republican · MO-3 · L000569

Joined Feb 9, 2012
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Rush, Bobby L.
Cosponsor

Rush, Bobby L.

Democratic · IL-1 · R000515

Joined Feb 14, 2012
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A
Larsen, Rick
Cosponsor

Larsen, Rick

Democratic · WA-2 · L000560

Joined Feb 28, 2012
Website
N/A
Office
2163 Rayburn House Office Building

Amendments

124 amendments
112/hamdt/968 Mar 7, 2012

An amendment numbered 1 printed in House Report 112-409 to make technical changes to the underlying bill.

Manager's amendment makes technical and clarifying changes to the bill.

On agreeing to the Fincher amendment (A001) Agreed to by voice vote.

112/hamdt/969 Mar 7, 2012

An amendment numbered 2 printed in House Report 112-409 to adjust the Emerging Growth Company definition for inflation, resulting in providing more flexibility for businesses.

Amendment adjusts the emerging growth company definition for inflation in order to provide more flexibility for businesses.

On agreeing to the McIntyre amendment (A002) Agreed to by voice vote.

112/hamdt/970 Mar 7, 2012

An amendment numbered 3 printed in House Report 112-409 to lower the gross annual revenue cap from $1,000,000,000 to $750,000,000 for emerging growth companies to remain eligible for the regulatory on-ramp and to strike the public float requirement for the on-ramp.

Amendment sought to lower the gross annual revenue cap from $1,000,000,000 to $750,000,000 for emerging growth companies to remain eligible for the regulatory on-ramp and to strike the public float requirement for the on-ramp.

On agreeing to the Himes amendment (A003) Failed by recorded vote: 164 - 245 (Roll no. 103).

112/hamdt/971 Mar 7, 2012

An amendment numbered 4 printed in House Report 112-409 to add a requirement that a company not be considered an "emerging growth company" if it has issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt over the prior three years.

Amendment adds a requirement that a company not be considered an emerging growth company if it has issued more than $1 billion in nonconvertible debt over the prior 3 years.

On agreeing to the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment (A004) Agreed to by voice vote.

112/hamdt/972 Mar 7, 2012

An amendment numbered 5 printed in House Report 112-409 to require Emerging Growth Companies to fully comply with say-on-pay and golden parachute shareholder votes.

Amendment sought to require emerging growth companies to fully comply with say-on-pay and golden parachute shareholder votes.

On agreeing to the Ellison amendment (A005) Failed by recorded vote: 169 - 244 (Roll no. 104).

112/hamdt/973 Mar 7, 2012

An amendment numbered 6 printed in House Report 112-409 to provide that if a broker or dealer is underwriting an initial public offering (IPO) for an emerging growth company (EGC) and providing research to the public about such IPO, those research reports need to be filed with the SEC, and the broker or dealer shall be held to stricter liability for their comments. Would also provide that if EGCs are communicating, either orally or in writing, with potential investors before or following an offering, they need to file those communications with the SEC.

Amendment sought to provide that if a broker or dealer is underwriting an initial public offering (IPO) for an emerging growth company (EGC) and providing research to the public about such IPO, those research reports need to be filed with the SEC, and the broker or dealer shall be held to stricter liability for their comments, and would also provide that if EGCs are communicating, either orally or in writing, with potential investors before or following an offering, they need to file those communications with the SEC.

On agreeing to the Waters amendment (A006) Failed by recorded vote: 161 - 259 (Roll no. 105).

112/hamdt/974 Mar 7, 2012

An amendment numbered 7 printed in House Report 112-409 to strike language that allows an emerging growth company or its underwriter to communicate with "institutions that are accredited investors.".

Amendment sought to narrow the permissible exemption to allow oral or written communications with potential investors who are qualified institutional investors but would omit accredited investors from the exemption in the name of investor protection.

On agreeing to the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment (A007) Failed by voice vote.

112/hamdt/975 Mar 7, 2012

An amendment numbered 8 printed in House Report 112-409 to establish new filing fee for Reg S-K Forms to discourage frivolous filings.

Page 15, line 16, strike the quotation mark and final period and after such line insert the following: (3) ADDITIONAL FILING FEE- ***.

By unanimous consent, the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment was withdrawn.

112/hamdt/976 Mar 7, 2012

An amendment numbered 9 printed in House Report 112-409 to require the Securities and Exchange Commission to perform a study, in consultation with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, of the effects on emerging growth companies of financial speculation on domestic oil and gasoline prices and to forward the results of that study to Congress.

Amendment sought to require the Securities and Exchange Commission to perform a study, in consultation with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, of the effects on emerging growth companies of financial speculation on domestic oil and gasoline prices and to forward the results of that study to Congress.

On agreeing to the Connolly (VA) amendment (A009) Failed by recorded vote: 185 - 236 (Roll no. 106).

112/hamdt/977 Mar 7, 2012

An amendment numbered 10 printed in House Report 112-409 to clarify that general advertising under this provision should only apply to Regulation D rule 506 offerings, allow for general solicitation in the secondary sale of these securities so long as only qualified institutional buyers purchase the securities, and provide consistency in interpretation that general advertising should not cause these offerings to be considered public offerings.

Amendment clarifies that the general advertising provision should only apply to Regulation D, rule 506 of the securities offerings; protects investors by allowing for general advertising in the secondary sale of securities, so long as only qualified institutional buyers purchase the securities; and provides consistency in the interpretation for regulators that general advertising should not cause private offerings to be considered public offerings.

On agreeing to the McCarthy (CA) amendment (A010) Agreed to by voice vote.

112/hamdt/978 Mar 8, 2012

An amendment numbered 11 printed in House Report 112-409 to, with respect to Rule 506 of Regulation D, provide an exemption from registration as a broker or dealer for trading platforms that do not charge a fee in connection with the purchase or sale of the security or permit general solicitations, general advertisements, or similar or related activities by issuers of such securities. Amendment would also enable the marketing of private shares to accredited investors through platforms.

Amendment provides an exemption from registration as a broker or dealer for trading platforms that do not charge a fee in connection with the purchase or sale of the security or permit general solicitations, general advertisements, or similar or related activities by issuers of such securities. Amendment also enables the marketing of private shares to accredited investors through platforms.

On agreeing to the McHenry amendment (A011) Agreed to by voice vote.

112/hamdt/979 Mar 8, 2012

An amendment numbered 12 printed in House Report 112-409 to increase the total number of investors and limit the number of non-accredited investors allowed to be holders of record before registration is required.

Amendment increases the exception from SEC registration to 2,000 investors, provided that no more than 500 are not accredited investors.

On agreeing to the Miller (NC) amendment (A012) Agreed to by voice vote.

Show 112 more amendments 124 total amendments
112/hamdt/980 Mar 8, 2012

An amendment numbered 13 printed in House Report 112-409 to authorize the Securities and Exchange Commission to study whether or not it has the authority to enforce anti-evasion provisions associated with the shareholder threshold.

Amendment authorizes the SEC to study whether or not it has the authority to enforce anti-evasion provisions associated with the shareholder threshold and to report the results to Congress.

On agreeing to the Schweikert amendment (A013) Agreed to by voice vote.

112/hamdt/981 Mar 8, 2012

An amendment numbered 14 printed in House Report 112-409 to require the SEC to conduct a study to address anti-evasion concerns and determine if the term "held of record" should mean beneficial owner of the security.

Amendment sought to require the SEC to conduct a study to address anti-evasion concerns and determine if the term "held of record" should mean beneficial owner of the security.

On agreeing to the Capuano amendment (A014) Failed by voice vote.

112/hamdt/982 Mar 8, 2012

An amendment numbered 15 printed in House Report 112-409 to require publicly traded companies to disclose on an annual basis the total number of employees they have in each country and the percentage increase or decrease in employment in each country.

Amendment sought to require publicly traded companies to disclose on an annual basis the total number of employees they have in each country and the percentage increase or decrease in employment in each country.

On agreeing to the Peters amendment (A015) Failed by recorded vote: 175 - 239 (Roll no. 107).

112/hamdt/983 Mar 8, 2012

An amendment numbered 16 printed in House Report 112-409 to require the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue a report to the Congress one year after enactment on the increase in initial public offerings that resulted from the act, including specific increases in filings by manufacturing and high-technology companies.

Amendment sought to require the SEC to issue a report to Congress one year after enactment on the increase in initial public offerings that resulted from the Act, including specific increases in filings by manufacturing and high-technology companies.

On agreeing to the Capps amendment (A016) Failed by recorded vote: 172 - 236 (Roll no. 108).

112/hamdt/984 Mar 8, 2012

An amendment numbered 17 printed in House Report 112-409 to require information to be made available online, and outreach to be conducted to small and medium-sized businesses, women-owned businesses, veteran-owned businesses, and minority-owned businesses to inform them about changes put in place by this legislation.

Amendment requires the SEC to provide information online and also conduct outreach to specified businesses to inform them about changes put in place by this legislation.

On agreeing to the Loebsack amendment (A017) Agreed to by voice vote.

112/samdt/1833 Mar 21, 2012

In the nature of a substitute.

Amendment SA 1833 ruled non-germane by the chair.

112/samdt/1834 Mar 21, 2012

To change the enactment date.

SA 1834 fell when SA 1833 ruled non-germane by the Chair.

112/samdt/1835 Mar 21, 2012

Of a perfecting nature.

SA 1835 fell when SA 1834 fell.

112/samdt/1836 Mar 21, 2012

To reauthorize the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

Amendment SA 1836 ruled non-germane by the chair.

112/samdt/1837 Mar 21, 2012

To change the enactment date.

SA 1837 fell when SA 1836 ruled non-germane by the Chair.

112/samdt/1838 Mar 21, 2012

To change the enactment date.

SA 1838 fell when cloture invoked on the bill.

112/samdt/1839 Mar 21, 2012

Of a perfecting nature.

SA 1839 fell when SA 1838 fell.

112/samdt/1840 Mar 21, 2012

Of a perfecting nature.

SA 1840 fell when SA 1839 fell.

112/samdt/1884 Mar 22, 2012

To amend the securities laws to provide for registration exemptions for certain crowdfunded securities, and for other purposes.

Amendment SA 1884 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 64 - 35. Record Vote Number: 54.

112/samdt/1931 Mar 22, 2012

To improve the bill.

Amendment SA 1931 not agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.