LawLinter
Back to search
S 3196 - 111

Pre-Election Presidential Transition Act of 2010

Became Public Law No: 111-283.

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

House votes
None linked

No House roll call vote is attached to this bill yet.

View votes
Source context
Linked data

3 sectors · 2 CBO estimates · spending context

Review context
Bill text
8
analyzed sections
2 deadlines 3 tax signals
Open stats
Latest action
Oct 15, 2010

Signed by President.

View timeline

Bill Text Stats

8
Analyzed sections
N/A
Detected dollar total
3
Tax signals
2
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 37.5%
Spending density 25.0%
Statutory Reference 12
Amendments 3
Benefits 3
Tax 3
Deadline 2
Spending 2
Agency 1

Top agencies

Administrator of the General Services Administration 1

Statutory references

3 U.S.C. 102 4
2 U.S.C. 431 2
3 USC 1 1
3 U.S.C. 102 1
3 USC 102 1
50 U.S.C. 435b 1
5 U.S.C. 1101 1
Public Law 111-283 1

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

Oct 15, 2010

Signed by President.

Oct 15, 2010

Signed by President.

Oct 15, 2010

Became Public Law No: 111-283.

Oct 15, 2010

Became Public Law No: 111-283.

Oct 4, 2010

Presented to President.

Oct 4, 2010

Presented to President.

Sep 30, 2010

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H7379)

Sep 30, 2010

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR 9/28/2010 H7039-7040)

Sep 30, 2010

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR 9/28/2010 H7039-7040)

Sep 30, 2010

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sep 30, 2010

Cleared for White House.

Sep 28, 2010

Received in the House.

Sep 28, 2010

Held at the desk.

Sep 28, 2010

Ms. Chu moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

Sep 28, 2010

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7039-7040)

Sep 28, 2010

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 3196.

Sep 28, 2010

At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Bilbray objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

Sep 24, 2010

Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S7450-7452)

Sep 24, 2010

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

Sep 24, 2010

Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

Sep 24, 2010

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Aug 2, 2010

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman without amendment. With written report No. 111-239.

Aug 2, 2010

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman without amendment. With written report No. 111-239.

Aug 2, 2010

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 499.

May 17, 2010

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

Apr 22, 2010

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia. Hearings held.

Apr 13, 2010

Introduced in Senate

Apr 13, 2010

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2242-2243)

Apr 13, 2010

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text of measure as introduced: CR S2243-2244)

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Technology and data privacy
22 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 76%

is amended to read such offices.''. (b) Administrator Required To Provide Technology Coordination Upon Request.--Section 3(a)(10) of the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 (3 U.S.C. 102 note) is amended to read as follows: ``(10) Notwithst

is amended to read vide technology coordination upon request Section 3(a)(10) of the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 (3 U.S.C. 102 note) is amended to read as follows: quoted-blo

is amended to read o such offices.''. (b) Administrator Required To Provide Technology Coordination Upon Request.--Section 3(a)(10) of the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 (3 U.S.C. 102 note) is amended to read as follows: ``(10) Notwith

Telecom and broadband
6 evidence matches
Impact 90% Confidence 74%

assistance to any computers or communications services provided to an eligible candidate under this subsection are secure; ``(iii) shall offer information and other assistance to eligible candidates on an equal basis and without regard to p

assistance to any computers or communications services provided to an eligible candidate under this subsection are secure; ``(iii) shall offer information and other assistance to eligible candidates on an equal basis and without regard to p

assistance to any computers or communications services provided to an eligible candidate under this subsection are secure; ``(iii) shall offer information and other assistance to eligible candidates on an equal basis and without regard to p

Defense
1 evidence matches
Impact 84% Confidence 78%

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Standing Senate

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

Implementation and spending context

Official USAspending.gov award records for agencies connected through bill-text agency signals. This can help review implementation-adjacent public spending context, but it is not proof that the law caused a specific award.

How to read this

USAspending records describe federal awards, grants, contracts, loans, direct payments, recipients, agencies, and dates reported through the official public spending system.

LawLinter links this context through agency names detected in bill text. That bridge is a research shortcut and should not be read as a legal or budget conclusion.

USAspending context shows official public award records for agencies connected through LawLinter bill-text agency signals. It is historical spending and award context only, not proof that this bill caused, authorized, required, or changed any award, grant, contract, payment, or program spending.

Agency sample by amount

Where the local sample is concentrated

$2.4B
General Services Administration $2.4B
123 sampled awards

Amounts reflect the local USAspending sample linked through agency text signals, not bill-caused spending.

Largest sampled awards

Award records in this context

PERATON INC. $609.1M
contracts · General Services Administration
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC $477.4M
contracts · General Services Administration
GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. $418.9M
contracts · General Services Administration
MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. $181.5M
contracts · General Services Administration
ZIMMER GUNSUL FRASCA ARCHITECTS LLP $120.1M
contracts · General Services Administration
G2 OPS, INC. $119.1M
contracts · General Services Administration

These bars summarize the visible sampled awards below so large awards are easier to scan.

Agency spending context

General Services Administration

Matched bill text signal: Administrator of the General Services Administration
Sampled awards123
Award amount in local sample$2,398,041,669
Open official USAspending agency page
contracts · GST0011AJ0025

PERATON INC.

General Services Administration
Award amount
$609,128,624

IS TO PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND EVOLUTION OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) CLASSIFIED NETWORKS. DHS CLASSIFIED NETWORKS ARE A FEDERAL ENTERPRISE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR CLASSIFIED INFORMATION SHARING WHICH EXTEND EXISTING US GOVERNMENT CAPABILITIES NOT ONLY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND ITS COMPONENTS, BUT TO OTHER FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND TO FIRST RESPONDERS AT THE STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LEVELS.

View award profile Official USAspending source
contracts · 47QFSA25F0011

MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.

General Services Administration
Award amount
$181,458,589

THE OBJECTIVE OF THE ARCWERX ARTEMIS ACQUISITION IS TO PROVIDE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, INNOVATIVE R&D, SW DEVELOPMENT, DIGITAL ENGINEERING, AIRCRAFT AND AEROSPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AND TESTING, MISSION CONCEPTS OF OPERATION, AND TRAINING.

View award profile Official USAspending source
contracts · GS11P08MKC0080

ZIMMER GUNSUL FRASCA ARCHITECTS LLP

General Services Administration
Award amount
$120,095,115

RECOVERY ACT AWARD ARRA FUNDED CODE: TAS::47 4543::TAS 1) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ARCHITECT-ENGINEER DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) CONSOLIDATION PROJECT AT ST. ELIZABETH'S WEST CAMPUS IN WASHINGTON, DC PER THE SCOPE OF WORK DATED 3/19/2010. (FEMA, TSA, ICE, CBP)

View award profile Official USAspending source

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

49 Public Law Nov 16, 2010

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on September 24, 2010. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Pre-Election Presidential Transition Act of 2010 - Amends the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 to direct the Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA) to provide certain presidential transition services and facilities, including office space, equipment, and payment of certain related expenses, to eligible presidential and vice-presidential candidates before a presidential general election. Directs the President, or the President's delegate, to take necessary and appropriate actions to plan and coordinate activities by the executive branch of the federal government to facilitate an efficient transfer of power to a successor President.

81 Passed House without amendment Nov 16, 2010

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on September 24, 2010. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Pre-Election Presidential Transition Act of 2010 - Amends the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 to direct the Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA) to provide certain presidential transition services and facilities, including office space, equipment, and payment of certain related expenses, to eligible presidential and vice-presidential candidates before a presidential general election. Directs the President, or the President's delegate, to take necessary and appropriate actions to plan and coordinate activities by the executive branch of the federal government to facilitate an efficient transfer of power to a successor President.

35 Passed Senate amended Oct 1, 2010

Pre-Election Presidential Transition Act of 2010 - Amends the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 to direct the Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA) to provide certain presidential transition services and facilities, including office space, equipment, and payment of certain related expenses, to eligible presidential and vice-presidential candidates before a presidential general election. Directs the President, or the President's delegate, to take necessary and appropriate actions to plan and coordinate activities by the executive branch of the federal government to facilitate an efficient transfer of power to a successor President.

80 Reported to Senate without amendment Sep 3, 2010

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Pre-Election Presidential Transition Act of 2010 - Amends the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 to direct the Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA) to provide certain presidential transition services and facilities, including office space, equipment, and payment of certain related expenses, to eligible presidential and vice-presidential candidates before a presidential general election. Directs the President, or the President's delegate, to take necessary and appropriate actions to plan and coordinate activities by the executive branch of the federal government to facilitate an efficient transfer of power to a successor President.

00 Introduced in Senate Apr 27, 2010

Pre-Election Presidential Transition Act of 2010 - Amends the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 to direct the Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA) to provide certain presidential transition services and facilities, including office space, equipment, and payment of certain related expenses, to eligible presidential and vice-presidential candidates before a presidential general election. Directs the President, or the President's delegate, to take necessary and appropriate actions to plan and coordinate activities by the executive branch of the federal government to facilitate an efficient transfer of power to a successor President.

Sponsors

Amendments

1 amendment
111/samdt/4658 Sep 24, 2010

In the nature of a substitute.

Amendment SA 4658 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.
DisclaimerReport issue