Back to bill
S 1405 - 111

Referred in House

Longfellow House-Washington's Headquarters National Historic Site Designation Act

3
Sections
0
Dollar amounts
0
Deadlines and effective dates
May 11, 2010
Text version date

Official source

Official PDF

Preview the source PDF from the official text formats without leaving this page, or open the original file in a new tab.

Open official PDF

Structured text

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 1405 Referred in House (RFH)] 111th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 1405 _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 11, 2010 Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources _______________________________________________________________________ AN ACT To redesignate the Longfellow National Historic Site, Massachusetts, as the ``Longfellow House-Washington's Headquarters National Historic Site''. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
Sec. 1.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Longfellow House-Washington's Headquarters National Historic Site Designation Act''.
Sec. 2.

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF LONGFELLOW NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE,

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF LONGFELLOW NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE, MASSACHUSETTS. (a) In General.--The Longfellow National Historic Site in Cambridge, Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as ``Longfellow House-Washington's Headquarters National Historic Site''. (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Longfellow National Historic Site shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Longfellow House-Washington's Headquarters National Historic Site''. Passed the Senate May 7, 2010. Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, Secretary.
Cached official text analysis. This viewer uses cached official bill text and deterministic section, phrase, fiscal, agency, deadline, and statutory-reference extraction. The analysis is navigation support, not a legal interpretation; consult the official text for authoritative wording.