Back to bill
HR 5605 - 111

Referred in Senate

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 47 East Fayette Street in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, as the "George C. Marshall Post Office".

2
Sections
0
Dollar amounts
0
Deadlines and effective dates
Nov 15, 2010
Text version date

Official source

Official PDF

Preview the source PDF from the official text formats without leaving this page, or open the original file in a new tab.

Open official PDF

Structured text

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 5605 Referred in Senate (RFS)] 111th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 5605 _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES November 15, 2010 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs _______________________________________________________________________ AN ACT To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 47 East Fayette Street in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, as the ``George C. Marshall Post Office''. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
Sec. 1.

SECTION 1. GEORGE C. MARSHALL POST OFFICE.

SECTION 1. GEORGE C. MARSHALL POST OFFICE. (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 47 East Fayette Street in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ``George C. Marshall Post Office''. (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George C. Marshall Post Office''. Passed the House of Representatives September 30 (legislative day September 29), 2010. Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, Clerk.
Cached official text analysis. This viewer uses cached official bill text and deterministic section, phrase, fiscal, agency, deadline, and statutory-reference extraction. The analysis is navigation support, not a legal interpretation; consult the official text for authoritative wording.