Back to search
S 550 - 110

A bill to preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

Became Public Law No: 110-201.

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

Bill Text Stats

3
Analyzed sections
N/A
Detected dollar total
0
Tax signals
0
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%
Spending density 0.0%
Statutory Reference 2
Amendments 1

Top agencies

N/A

Statutory references

Public Law 110-201 1
Section 903 of title 11 1

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

Apr 18, 2008

Signed by President.

Apr 18, 2008

Signed by President.

Apr 18, 2008

Became Public Law No: 110-201.

Apr 18, 2008

Became Public Law No: 110-201.

Apr 10, 2008

Presented to President.

Apr 10, 2008

Presented to President.

Apr 1, 2008

Mr. Davis (IL) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

Apr 1, 2008

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1853-1854)

Apr 1, 2008

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 550.

Apr 1, 2008

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H1853)

Apr 1, 2008

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1853)

Apr 1, 2008

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Apr 1, 2008

Cleared for White House.

Mar 13, 2008

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

Mar 13, 2008

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

Mar 10, 2008

Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Post Office, and the District of Columbia.

Feb 6, 2008

Received in the House.

Feb 6, 2008

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Feb 5, 2008

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Feb 4, 2008

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S609; text as passed Senate: CR S609)

Feb 4, 2008

Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S609; text as passed Senate: CR S609)

Jan 8, 2008

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman under authority of the order of the Senate of 12/19/2007 without amendment. With written report No. 110-256.

Jan 8, 2008

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman under authority of the order of the Senate of 12/19/2007 without amendment. With written report No. 110-256.

Jan 8, 2008

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 556.

Feb 15, 2007

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

Feb 12, 2007

Introduced in Senate

Feb 12, 2007

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1854)

Feb 12, 2007

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text of measure as introduced: CR S1854)

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Defense
1 evidence matches
Impact 79% Confidence 73%

Section 903 of title 11 Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs A BILL To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. 1. Composition of superior court Section 903 of title 11 of the Distri

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

49 Public Law Apr 25, 2008

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Amends the District of Columbia Code to increase from 58 to 61 the number of associate judges on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

81 Passed House without amendment Apr 3, 2008

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Amends the District of Columbia Code to increase from 58 to 61 the number of associate judges on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

82 Passed Senate without amendment Mar 4, 2008

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Amends the District of Columbia Code to increase from 58 to 61 the number of associate judges on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

80 Reported to Senate without amendment Mar 4, 2008

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Amends the District of Columbia Code to increase from 58 to 61 the number of associate judges on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

00 Introduced in Senate Feb 23, 2007

Amends the District of Columbia Code to increase from 58 to 61 the number of associate judges on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

Sponsors

Amendments

No amendment records are currently available for this bill.
Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.