Back to search
HR 1130 - 110

Judicial Disclosure Responsibility Act

Became Public Law No: 110-24.

Bill highlights

Votes, text signals, source context, and latest movement from this record.

Bill Text Stats

5
Analyzed sections
N/A
Detected dollar total
0
Tax signals
0
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%
Spending density 0.0%
Statutory Reference 5
Amendments 1

Top agencies

N/A

Statutory references

5 U.S.C. App 2
5 USC app 1
5 U.S.C. App 1
Public Law 110-24 1

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

May 3, 2007

Signed by President.

May 3, 2007

Signed by President.

May 3, 2007

Became Public Law No: 110-24.

May 3, 2007

Became Public Law No: 110-24.

Apr 24, 2007

Presented to President.

Apr 24, 2007

Presented to President.

Apr 20, 2007

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Apr 19, 2007

Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S4788)

Apr 19, 2007

Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4788)

Apr 19, 2007

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

Apr 19, 2007

Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

Apr 19, 2007

Cleared for White House.

Mar 22, 2007

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Mar 21, 2007

Ms. Sanchez, Linda T. moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

Mar 21, 2007

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2787-2788)

Mar 21, 2007

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1130.

Mar 21, 2007

At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

Mar 21, 2007

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2795-2796)

Mar 21, 2007

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 415 - 0 (Roll no. 177).(text: CR H2787)

Mar 21, 2007

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 415 - 0 (Roll no. 177). (text: CR H2787)

Mar 21, 2007

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Mar 20, 2007

Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 110-59.

Mar 20, 2007

Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 110-59.

Mar 20, 2007

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 30.

Feb 28, 2007

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

Feb 28, 2007

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

Feb 16, 2007

Introduced in House

Feb 16, 2007

Introduced in House

Feb 16, 2007

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Finance and banking
13 evidence matches
Impact 99% Confidence 78%

is amended by SEC. 3. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE REPORTS. (a) Extension of Authority.--Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking ``2005'' each place that term appears and inserting ``2009''.

is amended by SEC. 3. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE REPORTS. (a) Extension of Authority.--Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking ``2005'' each place that term appears and inserting ``2009''.

is amended by SEC. 3. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE REPORTS. (a) Extension of Authority.--Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking ``2005'' each place that term appears and inserting ``2009''.

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

49 Public Law May 4, 2007

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Judicial Disclosure Responsibility Act - Amends the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to: (1) restrict disclosure of personal information about family members of judges whose revelation might endanger them; and (2) extend through 2009 the authority of the Judicial Conference to redact certain personal information of judges from financial disclosure reports. Specifies addition types of information the Administrative Council of the U.S. Courts must include in its annual report to certain congressional committees on redaction of judicial financial disclosure reports.

82 Passed Senate without amendment Apr 24, 2007

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Judicial Disclosure Responsibility Act - Amends the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to: (1) restrict disclosure of personal information about family members of judges whose revelation might endanger them; and (2) extend through 2009 the authority of the Judicial Conference to redact certain personal information of judges from financial disclosure reports. Specifies addition types of information the Administrative Council of the U.S. Courts must include in its annual report to certain congressional committees on redaction of judicial financial disclosure reports.

81 Passed House without amendment Mar 23, 2007

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Judicial Disclosure Responsibility Act - Amends the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to: (1) restrict disclosure of personal information about family members of judges whose revelation might endanger them; and (2) extend through 2009 the authority of the Judicial Conference to redact certain personal information of judges from financial disclosure reports. Specifies addition types of information the Administrative Council of the U.S. Courts must include in its annual report to certain congressional committees on redaction of judicial financial disclosure reports.

79 Reported to House without amendment Mar 21, 2007

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Judicial Disclosure Responsibility Act - Amends the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to: (1) restrict disclosure of personal information about family members of judges whose revelation might endanger them; and (2) extend through 2009 the authority of the Judicial Conference to redact certain personal information of judges from financial disclosure reports. Specifies addition types of information the Administrative Council of the U.S. Courts must include in its annual report to certain congressional committees on redaction of judicial financial disclosure reports.

00 Introduced in House Feb 26, 2007

Judicial Disclosure Responsibility Act - Amends the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to: (1) restrict disclosure of personal information about family members of judges whose revelation might endanger them; and (2) extend through 2009 the authority of the Judicial Conference to redact certain personal information of judges from financial disclosure reports. Specifies addition types of information the Administrative Council of the U.S. Courts must include in its annual report to certain congressional committees on redaction of judicial financial disclosure reports.

Sponsors

Conyers, John, Jr.
Sponsor

Conyers, John, Jr.

Democratic · MI-13 · C000714

Joined Feb 16, 2007
Website
N/A
Phone
N/A
Office
N/A

Amendments

No amendment records are currently available for this bill.
Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.