Back to search

Bill Text Stats

12
Analyzed sections
N/A
Detected dollar total
0
Tax signals
3
Deadlines

Signal counts

Tax density 0.0%
Spending density 0.0%
Statutory Reference 27
Benefits 6
Amendments 5
Studies 5
Agency 3
Deadline 3

Top agencies

Secretary of Health and 1
Secretary of Health and Human 1
Secretary of Health and Human Services under 1

Statutory references

21 U.S.C. 355a 3
21 USC 355c 2
42 U.S.C. 217a 2
42 U.S.C. 262 2
42 U.S.C. 284m 2
42 U.S.C. 284m 2
Public Law 107-109 2
21 USC 301 1

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Timeline

Dec 3, 2003

Signed by President.

Dec 3, 2003

Signed by President.

Dec 3, 2003

Became Public Law No: 108-155.

Dec 3, 2003

Became Public Law No: 108-155.

Nov 21, 2003

Presented to President.

Nov 21, 2003

Presented to President.

Nov 19, 2003

Mr. Bilirakis moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

Nov 19, 2003

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H11567-11572)

Nov 19, 2003

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 650.

Nov 19, 2003

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H11567-11569)

Nov 19, 2003

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H11567-11569)

Nov 19, 2003

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Aug 8, 2003

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Jul 24, 2003

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Jul 24, 2003

Received in the House.

Jul 24, 2003

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Jul 23, 2003

Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S9811-9819; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S9811-9813)

Jul 23, 2003

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(text as passed Senate: CR S9816-9818)

Jul 23, 2003

Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (text as passed Senate: CR S9816-9818)

Jun 27, 2003

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Reported by Senator Gregg with an amendment. With written report No. 108-84. Additional views filed.

Jun 27, 2003

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Reported by Senator Gregg with an amendment. With written report No. 108-84. Additional views filed.

Jun 27, 2003

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 183.

Mar 19, 2003

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

Mar 18, 2003

Introduced in Senate

Mar 18, 2003

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3897-3898)

Mar 18, 2003

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3898-3900)

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Healthcare
261 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 90%

Health

Secretary of Health secretary of health

Secretary of Health secretary of health

Technology and data privacy
6 evidence matches
Impact 86% Confidence 70%

y obtained in pediatric patients, such as pharmacokinetic studies. ``(ii) Extrapolation between age groups.--A study may not be needed in each pediatric age group if data from one age group can be extrapolated to another age group. ``(3) De

study ned in pediatric patients, such as pharmacokinetic studies. ``(ii) Extrapolation between age groups.--A study may not be needed in each pediatric age group if data from 1 age group can be extrapolated to another age group. ``(3)

study ned in pediatric patients, such as pharmacokinetic studies. ``(ii) Extrapolation between age groups.--A study may not be needed in each pediatric age group if data from 1 age group can be extrapolated to another age group. ``(3)

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

Implementation and spending context

Official USAspending.gov award records for agencies connected through bill-text agency signals. This can help review implementation-adjacent public spending context, but it is not proof that the law caused a specific award.

How to read this

USAspending records describe federal awards, grants, contracts, loans, direct payments, recipients, agencies, and dates reported through the official public spending system.

LawLinter links this context through agency names detected in bill text. That bridge is a research shortcut and should not be read as a legal or budget conclusion.

USAspending context shows official public award records for agencies connected through LawLinter bill-text agency signals. It is historical spending and award context only, not proof that this bill caused, authorized, required, or changed any award, grant, contract, payment, or program spending.

Agency sample by amount

Where the local sample is concentrated

$146.2B
Department of Health and Human Services $146.2B
569 sampled awards

Amounts reflect the local USAspending sample linked through agency text signals, not bill-caused spending.

Largest sampled awards

Award records in this context

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES $18.8B
grants · Department of Health and Human Services
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES $17.6B
grants · Department of Health and Human Services
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES $17.5B
grants · Department of Health and Human Services
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES $16.2B
grants · Department of Health and Human Services
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES $16.1B
grants · Department of Health and Human Services
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CALIFORNIA $2.3B
grants · Department of Health and Human Services

These bars summarize the visible sampled awards below so large awards are easier to scan.

Agency spending context

Department of Health and Human Services

Matched bill text signal: Secretary of Health and
Sampled awards569
Award amount in local sample$146,150,587,987
Open official USAspending agency page

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

35 Passed Senate amended May 9, 2007

Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003 - Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require license applications for new drugs and biological products to assess such drug's or product's safety and effectiveness for relevant pediatric subpopulations, including dosage. Permits deferral of such assessments under specified circumstances, including if the Secretary of Health and Human Services finds that the drug or biological product is ready for approval for use in adults before pediatric studies are complete. Permits full waiver of such assessments under certain conditions, including if: (1) studies are highly impractical or impossible; or (2) there is no meaningful therapeutic advantage or benefit in the pediatric population and the drug or biological product is not likely to be used in a substantial number of pediatric patients. Permits partial waivers at the request of an applicant for a specific pediatric subpopulation if any of the full waiver grounds apply to that subpopulation or reasonable attempts for a pediatric formulation for that subpopulation have failed. Requires labels to provide indication in cases in which a waiver has been granted due to evidence a product would be unsafe or ineffective in pediatric populations. Authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services to specify a date for submission of pediatric assessments if: (1) the drug or biological product would represent a meaningful therapeutic benefit for pediatric patients for one or more claimed indications and the absence of adequate labeling could pose significant risks to pediatric patients; or (2) it is used for a substantial number of pediatric patients for the labeled indications and the absence of adequate labeling could pose significant risks to pediatric patients. Sets forth criteria for full waiver and partial waivers of such requirement. Requires labels to provide indication in cases in which a waiver has been granted due to evidence a product would be unsafe or ineffective in pediatric populations. Requires the Secretary to issue a written request for related pediatric studies under the Public Health Service Act or under this Act before requiring an assessment for a drug. Directs the Secretary, after determining that there is no agreement to such a written request, to certify whether the Secretary has sufficient funds to conduct the study under the Public Health Service Act, taking into account prioritization of drugs for which pediatric studies are needed. States that if a person fails to submit an assessment under this Act, or a request for approval of a pediatric formulation, the relevant drug or biological product may be considered misbranded solely because of that failure and subject to relevant enforcement action. Provides that the new authority under this Act to require pediatric studies shall only remain in effect so long as the pediatric exclusivity provisions under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act also remain in effect (until October 1, 2007). (Sec. 4) Declares that the provisions of this Act pertaining to research into pediatric uses for new drugs and biological products shall apply to license applications for such drugs and products submitted to the Secretary on or after April 1, 1999. Specifies procedures for the treatment of applications submitted between April 1, 1999, and the date of the enactment of this Act with respect to which waivers or deferrals were granted under previous regulations and with respect to which no waivers or deferrals were granted.

00 Introduced in Senate Nov 28, 2006

Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003 - Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require license applications for new drugs and biological products to assess such drug's or product's safety and effectiveness for relevant pediatric subpopulations, including dosage. Permits deferral of such assessments under specified circumstances. Permits full waiver of such assessments under certain conditions, including if: (1) studies are highly impractical or impossible; or (2) there is no meaningful therapeutic advantage or benefit in the pediatric population. Permits partial waivers at the request of an applicant for a specific pediatric subpopulation if any of the full waiver grounds apply to that subpopulation or reasonable attempts for a pediatric formulation for that subpopulation have failed. Requires labels to provide indication in cases in which a waiver has been granted due to evidence a product would be unsafe or ineffective in pediatric populations. Authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services to specify a date for submission of pediatric assessments if: (1) the drug or biological product would represent a meaningful therapeutic benefit for pediatric patients for one or more claimed indications and the absence of adequate labeling could pose significant risks to pediatric patients; or (2) it is used for a number of pediatric patients for the labeled indications and the absence of adequate labeling could pose significant risks to pediatric patients. Sets forth criteria for full waiver and partial waivers of such requirement. Requires labels to provide indication in cases in which a waiver has been granted due to evidence a product would be unsafe or ineffective in pediatric populations. Requires the Secretary to issue a written request for related pediatric studies under the Public Health Service Act or under this Act before requiring an assessment for a drug. Directs the Secretary, after determining that there is no agreement to such a written request, to certify whether the Secretary has sufficient funds to conduct the study under the Public Health Service Act, taking into account prioritization of drugs for which pediatric studies are needed. States that if a person fails to submit an assessment under this Act, or a request for approval of a pediatric formulation, the relevant drug or biological product may be considered misbranded and subject to enforcement action.

49 Public Law Jan 16, 2004

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on July 23, 2003. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003 - (Sec. 2) Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require license applications for new drugs and biological products to assess such drug's or product's safety and effectiveness for relevant pediatric subpopulations, including dosage. Permits deferral of such assessments under specified circumstances, including if the Secretary of Health and Human Services finds that the drug or biological product is ready for approval for use in adults before pediatric studies are complete. Permits full waiver of such assessments under certain conditions, including if: (1) studies are highly impractical or impossible; or (2) there is no meaningful therapeutic advantage or benefit in the pediatric population and the drug or biological product is not likely to be used in a substantial number of pediatric patients. Permits partial waivers at the request of an applicant for a specific pediatric subpopulation if any of the full waiver grounds apply to that subpopulation or reasonable attempts for a pediatric formulation for that subpopulation have failed. Requires labels to provide indication in cases in which a waiver has been granted due to evidence a product would be unsafe or ineffective in pediatric populations. Authorizes the Secretary to specify a date for submission of pediatric assessments if: (1) the drug or biological product would represent a meaningful therapeutic benefit for pediatric patients for one or more claimed indications and the absence of adequate labeling could pose significant risks to pediatric patients; or (2) it is used for a substantial number of pediatric patients for the labeled indications and the absence of adequate labeling could pose significant risks to pediatric patients. Sets forth criteria for full waiver and partial waivers of such requirement. Requires labels to provide indication in cases in which a waiver has been granted due to evidence a product would be unsafe or ineffective in pediatric populations. Requires the Secretary to issue a written request for related pediatric studies under the Public Health Service Act or under this Act before requiring an assessment for a drug. Directs the Secretary, after determining that there is no agreement to such a written request, to certify whether the Secretary has sufficient funds to conduct the study under the Public Health Service Act, taking into account prioritization of drugs for which pediatric studies are needed. States that if a person fails to submit an assessment under this Act, or a request for approval of a pediatric formulation, the relevant drug or biological product may be considered misbranded solely because of that failure and subject to relevant enforcement action. Provides that the new authority under this Act to require pediatric studies shall only remain in effect so long as the pediatric exclusivity provisions under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act also remain in effect (until October 1, 2007). (Sec. 4) Declares that the provisions of this Act pertaining to research into pediatric uses for new drugs and biological products shall apply to license applications for such drugs and products submitted to the Secretary on or after April 1, 1999. Specifies procedures for the treatment of applications submitted between April 1, 1999, and the date of the enactment of this Act with respect to which waivers or deferrals were granted under previous regulations and with respect to which no waivers or deferrals were granted.

Sponsors

Amendments

No amendment records are currently available for this bill.
Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.