Back to search
HR 1058 - 104

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

Became Public Law No: 104-67.

Bill Text Stats

Bill text analysis is not available for this record yet.

Affected Sectors

How to read this

Sectors are deterministic matches from official Congress.gov data and cached bill text. They are source-derived signals, not conclusions about intent or economic effect.

Evidence matches count official fields, normalized subjects, cached text snippets, or extracted entities that matched the sector rules.

Impact is a bill-level rollup used for sorting and filtering. It is not an economic impact estimate.

Confidence is the strongest individual match score behind that sector.

Evidence snippets show why a sector matched and can repeat when Congress.gov repeats the same phrase across official fields.

Finance and banking
3 evidence matches
Impact 100% Confidence 90%

Finance and Financial Sector

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Became Public Law No: 104-67. Finance and Financial Sector

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Became Public Law No: 104-67. Finance and Financial Sector

CBO Cost Estimates

Official Congressional Budget Office cost estimate links associated with this bill through Congress.gov records.

How to read this

CBO estimates are official source documents with their own assumptions, scope, and publication dates. They can score a bill, a version of a bill, or a broader legislative package.

LawLinter stores the source link from Congress.gov and does not replace the CBO document. Use these cards as pointers for source review, not as independent fiscal advice.

CBO context shows source-attributed Congressional Budget Office cost estimates linked from official Congress.gov bill records. It is research context only; read the official CBO source document for assumptions, scope, and dates.

No CBO cost estimate is currently linked for this bill.

Campaign Finance Context

Related FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance records for lawmakers and candidates tied to this bill through source-attributed legislative relationships. These are not donations to the bill itself.

How to read this

Amounts shown here are campaign-finance totals for sponsor or cosponsor-linked candidates and their committees in the displayed FEC cycle.

They are not donations to this bill, spending on this bill, or proof that money influenced or caused sponsorship, cosponsorship, votes, or legislative outcomes.

If multiple linked lawmakers have FEC records, this section can show multiple candidate cards and separate sponsor/cosponsor rollups.

Campaign-finance context uses source-attributed FEC/OpenFEC records that are related or relevant to the displayed bill, lawmaker, candidate, committee, or legislative relationship through deterministic links. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, or that money caused a sponsorship, vote, or legislative outcome.

No FEC/OpenFEC campaign-finance context is currently linked for this bill.

Lobbying Context

Related LDA.gov filings where public lobbying activity descriptions reference this bill. These records are source-attributed research context, not evidence of influence or causation.

How to read this

LDA filings are public lobbying disclosure records. LawLinter links them here only when the filing activity text contains an exact-looking reference to this bill.

A filing can mention many issues, clients, agencies, or bills. A match should be treated as a pointer for review, not as a conclusion about why legislation changed or how any lawmaker acted.

Lobbying context uses source-attributed LDA.gov records that appear related to this bill through bill references in public lobbying activity descriptions. It is research context only, not proof of influence, causation, endorsement, lobbying effectiveness, or legislative intent.

No LDA.gov lobbying disclosure context is currently linked for this bill.

Summary

48 Conference report filed in House May 7, 2001

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Reduction of Abusive Litigation Title II: Reduction of Coercive Settlements Title III: Auditor Disclosure of Corporate Fraud Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 - Title I: Reduction of Abusive Litigation - Amends the Securities Act of 1933 (SA) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA) (together, the Acts) with respect to private class action suits to mandate that each plaintiff seeking to serve as a representative party file a sworn certification: (1) that the plaintiff did not purchase the subject matter securities at the direction of counsel or in order to participate in a private action; (2) that identifies any other action filed during the preceding three-year period in which the plaintiff sought to serve as a representative party on behalf of a class; and (3) that the plaintiff will not accept payment for serving as a representative party on behalf of a class beyond the plaintiff's pro rata share of any recovery, except as approved by the court. (Sec. 101) Prescribes guidelines for early notice to class members of the appointment of the lead plaintiff. Provides for a court-appointed lead plaintiff. Requires the court to adopt a rebuttable presumption that the most adequate plaintiff is the person with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class. Declares that a person may be a lead plaintiff (or an officer, director, or fiduciary of a lead plaintiff) in no more than five securities class actions brought as plaintiff class actions during any three-year period. Prohibits settlements under seal except in limited circumstances. Mandates disclosure of settlement terms to class members. Requires the court to determine whether an interest on the part of plaintiff's counsel in the securities that are the subject of the litigation constitutes a conflict of interest sufficient to disqualify the attorney from representing the party. Provides for: (1) a stay of discovery during the pendency of any motion to dismiss; and (2) preservation of the evidence during the pendency of any stay of discovery. Mandates court review, upon final adjudication of an action, of the parties' compliance with certain Rules of Civil Procedure. Sets forth a rebuttable presumption in favor of award of attorney's fees and costs to opposing counsel by the party in violation of such Rules. Establishes each defendant's right to written interrogatories to the jury on the issue of the defendant's particular state of mind with respect to specified alleged violations. Amends the SEA to authorize the court to require security for payment of class action costs. Sets forth as prerequisites for securities fraud actions: (1) particularity in securities fraud actions alleging misleading statements and omissions; (2) specific allegations of facts giving rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with the required state of mind in a private action in which the plaintiff may recover money damages; and (3) the burden on the plaintiff of proving loss causation. Requires the court to dismiss the complaint upon defendant's motion if the first two such requirements are not met. Limits damages, where the plaintiff seeks to establish them by reference to the market price of a security, to the difference between the purchase or sale price paid or received by the plaintiff, as appropriate, and the mean trading price of the security during the 90-day period beginning on the date on which the information correcting the misstatement or omission that is the basis for the action is disseminated to the market. Specifies an exception to this rule if the plaintiff sells or repurchases the subject security during such 90-day period. (Sec. 102) Amends the Acts to provide certain issuers of securities a safe harbor from liability for forward-looking statements regarding a security's projected performance or operations, if: (1) the statement is immaterial or is identified as a forward-looking statement and accompanied by certain cautionary statements; or (2) the plaintiff fails to prove that the statement was made with either actual knowledge of its false or misleading nature by a natural person, or actual approval by an executive officer. Prescribes conditions for satisfaction of such requirements by oral forward-looking statements. States that there is no duty upon any person to update a forward-looking statement. Requires the court to stay discovery during the pendency of defendant's motion for summary judgment upon grounds that the complaint is based upon a forward-looking statement for which this Act precludes a claim for relief. (Sec. 103) Amends the SEA to prohibit brokers, dealers, or associated persons from soliciting or accepting referral fees for assisting an attorney in obtaining the representation of any person in a private securities action. Amends the Acts to prohibit the use of disgorgement funds resulting from actions brought by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) in Federal court to pay legal expenses incurred by private parties seeking distribution of such funds. (Sec. 104) Amends the SEA to authorize the SEC to seek injunctive relief or money penalties against aiders and abettors of securities laws violations. (Sec. 105) Amends the SA to allow a defendant to avoid rescissionary damages in an action based upon misstatements or omissions contained in a prospectus if the defendant proves that the depreciation in the value of a security resulted from factors unrelated to the alleged misstatement or omission. (Sec. 106) Directs the SEC to recommend to the Congress protections from securities fraud and abusive or unnecessary securities fraud litigation for senior citizens and qualified retirement plans if it finds that they have been adversely impacted by abusive or unnecessary securities fraud litigation, or require greater protection against such fraud than is provided in this Act. (Sec. 107) Amends the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute to remove securities fraud from its purview with respect to treble damages in a civil action, except with regard to any participant in the fraud that is criminally convicted in connection with the fraud, in which case the statute of limitations shall start to run on the date the conviction becomes final. Title II: Reduction of Coercive Settlements - Amends the SEA to assign joint and several liability for damages only if the trier of fact specifically determines that the defendant knowingly violated securities laws. Restricts liability for damages solely to that portion of the judgment that corresponds to the percentage of each individual defendant's responsibility for plaintiff's losses. Prescribes determination of responsibility guidelines for the trier of fact. Requires proportionate contributions from individually liable covered persons for the uncollectible shares of other covered persons in specified circumstances. Provides that the standard for allocation of damages and the procedure for reallocation of uncollectible shares among defendants shall not be disclosed to the jury. Discharges from all claims of contribution brought by other persons any covered person who settles any private action at any time before final verdict or judgment. Bars all future claims against such settling covered persons. Establishes a statute of limitations for an action for contribution among defendants. Title III: Auditor Disclosure of Corporate Fraud - Modifies requirements for audits conducted by an independent public accountant of an issuer's financial statements to include procedures to: (1) detect illegal acts that would have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts; (2) identify related party transactions material to financial statements; and (3) evaluate an issuer's ability to continue as a going concern. Sets forth notification and reporting guidelines for a public accountant who becomes aware of information indicating possible illegal activities during the course of an audit. Declares that an auditor shall not be liable in a private action for complying with such guidelines. Imposes civil penalties for an auditor's noncompliance with this Act.

35 Passed Senate amended May 7, 2001

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Reduction of Abusive Litigation Title II: Reduction of Coercive Settlements Title III: Auditor Disclosure of Corporate Fraud Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 - Title I: Reduction of Abusive Litigation - Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act) to prohibit brokers or dealers from soliciting or accepting referral fees from an attorney for obtaining the representation of a customer in unapproved action. (Sec. 102) Amends the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Acts) with respect to class action suits to: (1) require the court to determine whether an interest on the part of plaintiff's counsel in the securities that are the subject of the litigation constitutes a conflict of interest sufficient to disqualify the attorney from representing the party; (2) prohibit the use of disgorgement funds resulting from actions brought by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) to pay legal expenses incurred by private parties seeking distribution of such funds; (3) mandate recovery by the representative party in a class action suit in the same manner as all other members of the class; (4) restrict settlements under seal; (5) restrict payment of attorney's fees from settlement funds; (6) mandate disclosure of settlement terms to class members; and (7) prescribe procedures governing the appointment of the lead plaintiff. (Sec. 103) Amends the Acts to prescribe procedural guidelines to: (1) impose sanctions upon the party in violation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with respect to abusive litigation; and (2) stay discovery during the pendency of any motion to dismiss (unless particularized discovery is necessary to preserve evidence). (Sec. 104) Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require: (1) particularity in securities fraud actions alleging misleading statements and omissions; (2) specific allegations of facts giving rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with the required state of mind in a private action in which the plaintiff may recover money damages; and (3) place the burden of proving loss causation upon the plaintiff. (Sec. 105) Amends the Acts to provide an issuer of securities, except in specified circumstances, with safe harbor from liability for forward-looking statements regarding a security's projected performance or operations. Amends the Investment Company Act of 1940 to prescribe guidelines under which the Securities and Exchange Commission shall promulgate regulations governing forward-looking statements. (Sec. 106) Amends the Acts to grant the defendant, in a private action for money damages based only on the defendant's particular state of mind, the right to have the court submit to the jury a written state-of-mind interrogatory for each alleged violation. (Sec. 107) Amends the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute to exclude as a basis for a civil action for treble damages conduct that would have been actionable as securities fraud. (Sec. 108) Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to authorize the SEC to seek injunctive relief or money penalties against aiders and abettors of securities laws violations. (Sec. 109) Amends the Securities Act of 1933 to allow a defendant to avoid rescissionary damages in an action based upon misstatements or omissions contained in a prospectus if the defendant proves that the depreciation in the value of a security resulted from factors unrelated to the alleged misstatement or omission. (Sec. 110) Presents the findings of the Congress that: (1) senior citizens and qualified retirement plans are too often the target of securities fraud of the kind evidenced in the Charles Keating, Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, and American Continental Corporation situations; (2) this Act changes the standards and procedures for securities fraud actions; and (3) the SEC has indicated concern with some provisions of this Act. Directs the SEC to: (1) determine whether investors that are senior citizens or qualified retirement plans require greater protection against securities fraud than is provided for in this Act; and (2) recommend protections to the Congress that the SEC determines are appropriate to thoroughly protect such investors. (Sec. 111) Amends the RICO statute to include securities fraud within its purview for treble damages in a civil action if any participant in the fraud is criminally convicted in connection therewith, in which case the statute of limitations shall start to run on the date the conviction becomes final. Title II: Reduction of Coercive Settlements - Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prescribe a limitation-on-damages formula (difference between price and value) in an action based upon a misstatement or omission. (Sec. 202) Modifies the allocation of damages scheme to distinguish between primary degrees of responsibility and the application of proportionate liability. Title III: Auditor Disclosure of Corporate Fraud - Modifies requirements for audits conducted by an independent public accountant of an issuer's financial statements to include procedures to: (1) detect illegal acts that would have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts; (2) identify related party transactions material to financial statements; and (3) evaluate an issuer's ability to continue as a going concern. (Sec. 301) Sets forth notification and reporting guidelines for a public accountant who detects illegal activities during the course of an audit. Declares that an auditor shall not be liable in a private action for complying with such guidelines. Imposes civil penalties for an auditor's noncompliance with this Act.

36 Passed House amended May 7, 2001

Securities Litigation Reform Act - Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with respect to class actions, to require a court-appointed class action steering committee, composed of class members, to direct counsel for the plaintiff class (plaintiff steering committee). (Sec. 2) Prohibits the use of disgorgement funds resulting from actions brought by the Securities Exchange Commission (the Commission) to pay legal expenses incurred by private parties seeking distribution of such funds. (Sec. 3) Declares that the portion of any final judgment or settlement awarded to class plaintiffs serving as the representative parties shall be equal (on a per share basis) to the portion of the final judgment awarded to all other members of the class. Revises the guidelines for private class action suits to: (1) restrict to five the number of class actions filed by a named plaintiff during any three-year period; (2) subject a losing party litigant, if certain conditions apply, to liability for the prevailing party's legal fees; and (3) require the court to make a disqualifying conflict of interest determination with respect to a plaintiff's counsel who directly owns or has a beneficial interest in the securities that are the subject of the litigation. Requires a court to require just and equitable security for the payment of awardable fees and expenses from the attorney for the plaintiff class, the plaintiff class, or both. Sets forth disclosure guidelines for any proposed settlement agreement that is disseminated to the plaintiff class, including: (1) a statement about agreement or disagreement on the amount of recoverable damages per share and the likelihood of the plaintiff's prevailing; (2) the amount of legal costs and fees sought as part of the settlement; and (3) the identification of lawyers' representatives who will be available to answer questions from class members. Revises the guidelines for private class action suits to: (1) mandate discharge of a defendant who settles before verdict or judgment from all claims for contribution by nonsettling persons; (2) provide for recovery of contribution by a person who becomes liable for damages from certain non-parties who would have been liable for the same damages, if joined in the original suit; and (3) grant defendants the right to submit to the jury written interrogatories on the issue of each defendant's state of mind (scienter) at the time the alleged violation occurred. Prohibits brokers or dealers from soliciting or accepting referral fees for assisting an attorney in obtaining the representation of a customer in any private action. (Sec. 4) Delineates the requirements for securities fraud actions, including: (1) explicit pleading and proof of scienter; (2) plaintiff's reliance on a material misstatement or omission that proximately caused the plaintiff's loss; and (3) limitations on damages. (Sec. 5) Defines the circumstances ("safe harbor") in which a person shall not be held liable in a private action based on a fraudulent statement with respect to a forward-looking statement (projections or estimates of future events). Prescribes guidelines under which the court shall restrict discovery to the specific issue of the applicability of the "safe harbor." Directs the Commission to adopt a regulatory framework regarding the making of forward-looking statements that will be deemed to preclude liability under this Act. (Sec. 6) Amends the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statute to exclude from its purview an action involving fraud in the sale of securities. (Sec. 7) Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to include within statutorily mandated audit requirements specified fraud detection and disclosure procedures to be followed by an independent public accountant. Authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission to impose civil penalties for willful violations of this Act by an independent public accountant.

00 Introduced in House May 7, 2001

Securities Litigation Reform Act - Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with respect to class actions, to require a court-appointed class action steering committee, composed of class members, to direct counsel for the plaintiff class (plaintiff steering committee). (Sec. 2) Prohibits the use of disgorgement funds resulting from actions brought by the Securities Exchange Commission (the Commission) to pay legal expenses incurred by private parties seeking distribution of such funds. (Sec. 3) Declares that the portion of any final judgment or settlement awarded to class plaintiffs serving as the representative parties shall be equal (on a per share basis) to the portion of the final judgment awarded to all other members of the class. Revises the guidelines for private class action suits to: (1) restrict to five the number of class actions filed by a named plaintiff during any three-year period; (2) subject a losing party litigant, if certain conditions apply, to liability for the prevailing party's legal fees; and (3) require the court to make a conflict of interest determination with respect to a plaintiff's counsel who directly owns or has a beneficial interest in the securities that are the subject of the litigation. Requires a court to require just and equitable security for the payment of awardable fees and expenses from the attorney for the plaintiff class, the plaintiff class, or both. Sets forth disclosure guidelines for any proposed settlement agreement that is disseminated to the plaintiff class, including: (1) a statement about agreement or disagreement on the amount of recoverable damages per share and the likelihood of the plaintiff's prevailing; (2) the amount of legal costs and fees sought as part of the settlement; and (3) the identification of lawyers' representatives who will be available to answer questions from class members. Revises the guidelines for private class action suits to: (1) mandate discharge of a defendant who settles before verdict or judgment from all claims for contribution by nonsettling persons; (2) provide for recovery of contribution by a person who becomes liable for damages from certain non-parties who would have been liable for the same damages, if joined in the original suit; and (3) grant defendants the right to submit to the jury written interrogatories on the issue of each defendant's state of mind (scienter) at the time the alleged violation occurred. Prohibits brokers or dealers from soliciting or accepting referral fees for assisting an attorney in obtaining the representation of a customer in any private action. (Sec. 4) Delineates the requirements for securities fraud actions, including: (1) explicit pleading and proof of scienter; (2) plaintiff's reliance on a material misstatement or omission that proximately caused the plaintiff's loss; and (3) limitations on damages. (Sec. 5) Defines the circumstances ("safe harbor") in which a person shall not be held liable for the publication of predictive statements in any action based on a fraudulent statement under this Act. Permits the defendant in such action to move for an automatic protective order to restrict all discovery to the specific issue of the applicability of the "safe harbor." Directs the Commission to adopt a regulatory framework to implement the "safe harbor" requirements of this Act with respect to predictive statements concerning the future economic performance of an issuer of securities.

Sponsors

Timeline

Dec 22, 1995

Veto message considered by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S19146-19154)

Dec 22, 1995

Passed Senate over veto: Passed Senate over veto by Yea-Nay Vote. 68-30. Record Vote No: 612.(consideration: CR S19180)

Dec 22, 1995

Passed Senate over veto by Yea-Nay Vote. 68-30. Record Vote No: 612. (consideration: CR S19180)

Dec 22, 1995

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Dec 22, 1995

Became Public Law No: 104-67.

Dec 22, 1995

Became Public Law No: 104-67.

Dec 21, 1995

Veto message received in Senate. Held at the desk.

Dec 20, 1995

The Chair laid before the House the veto message from the President.

Dec 20, 1995

The Chair announced that the message of the President would be spread at large upon the pages of the Journal and that the veto message and the bill be printed as a House Document

Dec 20, 1995

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on question of passage of the bill, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding.

Dec 20, 1995

Passed House over veto: Two-thirds of the Members present having voted in the affirmative the bill is passed, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding. Passed by the Yeas and Nays (2/3 required): 319 - 100, 1 Present (Roll No. 870).(consideration: CR H15215-15224)

Dec 20, 1995

Two-thirds of the Members present having voted in the affirmative the bill is passed, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding. Passed by the Yeas and Nays (2/3 required): 319 - 100, 1 Present (Roll No. 870). (consideration: CR H15215-15224)

Dec 19, 1995

Mr. Thomas asked unanimous consent that if the Chair lays before the House a veto message from the President on the bill today, that the message of the President be spread at large upon the pages of the Journal; that the message and accompanying papers be printed as a House Document; and that further consideration of the veto message be postponed until Wednesday, December 20, 1995. Agreed to without objection.

Dec 19, 1995

Mr. Thomas asked unanimous consent That if the Chair lays before the House a veto message from the President on the bill H.R. 1058 today--that the objections of the President be spread at large upon the Journal and that the message and bill be ordered printed as a House Document; and that consideration of the veto message be postponed until Wednesday, December 20, 1995. Agreed to without objection.

Dec 19, 1995

Vetoed by President.(consideration: CR 12/20/95 H15214-15215)

Dec 19, 1995

Vetoed by President. (consideration: CR 12/20/95 H15214-15215)

Dec 7, 1995

Presented to President.

Dec 7, 1995

Presented to President.

Dec 6, 1995

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Dec 6, 1995

Rule H. Res. 290 passed House.

Dec 6, 1995

Mr. Bliley brought up conference report H. Rept. 104-369 for consideration as a privileged matter.

Dec 6, 1995

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.

Dec 6, 1995

The previous question was ordered without objection.

Dec 6, 1995

Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 320 - 102, 1 Present (Roll no. 839).(consideration: CR H14039-14055)

Dec 6, 1995

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Dec 6, 1995

On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 320 - 102, 1 Present (Roll no. 839). (consideration: CR H14039-14055)

Dec 5, 1995

Conference report considered in Senate. By Unanimous Consent.

Dec 5, 1995

Conference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 65-30. Record Vote No: 589.(consideration: CR S17997)

Dec 5, 1995

Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 65-30. Record Vote No: 589. (consideration: CR S17997)

Dec 5, 1995

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 290 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 1058. Waiving all points of ordder against the conference report and against its consideration.

Nov 29, 1995

Conference papers: Senate report and managers' statement held at the desk in Senate.

Nov 28, 1995

Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.

Nov 28, 1995

Conferees agreed to file conference report.

Nov 28, 1995

Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 104-369 filed.(text of conference report: CR H13692-13699)

Nov 28, 1995

Conference report H. Rept. 104-369 filed. (text of conference report: CR H13692-13699)

Nov 18, 1995

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Nov 17, 1995

Senate insists on its amendments agrees to request for a conference, appoints conferees D'Amato; Gramm; Bennett; Grams; Domenici; Sarbanes; Dodd; Kerry; Bryan. (consideration: CR S17361-17362)

Oct 25, 1995

Message on House action received in Senate and at the desk: House requests a conference.

Oct 24, 1995

Mr. Bliley asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and request a conference.

Oct 24, 1995

On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and request a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H10690)

Oct 24, 1995

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Oct 24, 1995

The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on Commerce for consideration of the House bill, and the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Bliley, Tauzin, Fields (TX), Cox, White, Dingell, Markey, Bryant (TX), and Eshoo.

Oct 24, 1995

The Speaker appointed additional conferees - from the Committee on the Judiciary for consideration of the House bill, and the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Hyde, McCollum, and Conyers.

Jun 29, 1995

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Jun 28, 1995

Senate Committee on Banking discharged by Unanimous Consent.

Jun 28, 1995

Senate Committee on Banking discharged by Unanimous Consent.

Jun 28, 1995

Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S9209-9226)

Jun 28, 1995

Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S. 240 amended.

Jun 28, 1995

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate in lieu of S. 240 with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Yea-Nay Vote. 69-30. Record Vote No: 295.

Jun 28, 1995

Passed Senate in lieu of S. 240 with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Yea-Nay Vote. 69-30. Record Vote No: 295.

Apr 6, 1995

Subcommittee on Securities. Hearings held.

Mar 22, 1995

Subcommittee on Securities. Hearings held.

Mar 10, 1995

Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.

Mar 8, 1995

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2818-2864)

Mar 8, 1995

The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.

Mar 8, 1995

The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1058.

Mar 8, 1995

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Mar 8, 1995

The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

Mar 8, 1995

Mr. Markey moved to recommit with instructions to Commerce.

Mar 8, 1995

DEBATE - The House proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the motion to recommit the bill to the Committee on Commerce with instructions that the Committee report the bill back to the House forthwith with the Manton and Dingell amendments included in the bill.

Mar 8, 1995

The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.

Mar 8, 1995

On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 172 - 251, 1 Present (Roll no. 215). (consideration: CR H2863)

Mar 8, 1995

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 325 - 99, 1 Present (Roll no. 216).

Mar 8, 1995

On passage Passed by recorded vote: 325 - 99, 1 Present (Roll no. 216).

Mar 8, 1995

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Mar 8, 1995

The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 1058.

Mar 7, 1995

Rule H. Res. 105 passed House.

Mar 7, 1995

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 105. (consideration: CR H2760-2779)

Mar 7, 1995

Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1058 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 5-minute rule, not to exceed 8 hours. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the amendment to be offered was printed in the Congressional Record. Upon passage H. Res. 103 is laid on the table.

Mar 7, 1995

House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 105 and Rule XXIII.

Mar 7, 1995

The Speaker designated the Honorable Larry Combest to act as Chairman of the Committee.

Mar 7, 1995

GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.

Mar 7, 1995

Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1058 as unfinished business.

Mar 6, 1995

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 105 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1058 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 5-minute rule, not to exceed 8 hours. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the amendment to be offered was printed in the Congressional Record. Upon passage H. Res. 103 is laid on the table.

Mar 3, 1995

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 103 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1058 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider the amendment printed in the reort of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered in the manner specified. All points of order against the amendment for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI shall be waived. The bill shall be considered for amendment under the 5-minute rule, not to exceed 8 hours. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the amendment to be offered was printed in the Congressional Record.

Feb 27, 1995

Introduced in House

Feb 27, 1995

Introduced in House

Feb 27, 1995

Referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Feb 27, 1995

Referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

House Votes

No House roll call votes have been linked to this bill yet.

Amendments

No amendment records are currently available for this bill.
Compiled bill record. Bill pages combine Congress.gov source payloads, normalized relationships, cached text analysis, vote links, and deterministic sector/signal extraction. This is not an official government record or legal advice; use the official source link when accuracy matters.